Saturday, September 19, 2009
THE INCREDIBLE SHRINKING PRESIDENT
Read through the comments for the post title.
FLEAS, AD INFINITUM
much longer history.
The couplet is from the great British mathematician Augustus De Morgan (1806-1871), who adapted it from the Anglo-Irish satirist, essayist and author Jonathan Swift (1667-1745).
De Morgan:
Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite 'em,Swift:
And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum.
And the great fleas themselves, in turn, have greater fleas to go on;
While these again have greater still, and greater still, and so on.
So, naturalists observe, a flea[Added Note]: The phrase “mimsy were the borogroves” is from Lewis Carroll’s Jabberwocky. It’s also the title of a science fiction book written by Lewis Padgett (aka Henry Kuttner and Catherine L. Moore), published in 1943, which I read - and enjoyed - as a teen sci-fi addict.
Has smaller fleas that on him prey;
And these have smaller still to bite ’em;
And so proceed ad infinitum
NASA WATCH
The Committee concludes that no rational exploratory program can be funded under the existing funding constraint and that plans for America's space exploration program would de facto be halted and human operations limited to low earth orbit.... The reason ... is, simplistically stated, that for sixty percent of the needed funds, one cannot go sixty percent of the way to Mars.Given the proclivities of the current Administration, this doesn’t look good.
INSURANCE EXCHANGE RISKS
Regina Herzlinger, a professor at the Harvard Business School, adds detail to my concern, using the Massachusetts government exchange, the Connector, as Exhibit A.
I’d like to believe that the health insurance exchange concept would work, provided that exchanges are entirely private, have national reach, and enjoy the same tax status as employer-sponsored plans.
P*SS ON EARTH

Over Hungary, by the Ruins of Essegvar. Last Wednesday, several skygazers scratched their heads when they saw this mysterious glow in the sky. To anyone who's ever pondered what urine looks like in space -- c'mon, don't be shy -- we say: wonder no more, because photos of the phenomenon have finally hit the internet.
Via Instapundit.
Friday, September 18, 2009
YOU DON’T SAY
Okay, so how about if I just call them bigots?
MUGGED BY REALITY
MAINSTREAM UNICORNS
Of course not. Liberals believe they are the mainstream. They also believe in unicorns.
ADVANCED PLANNING DIRECTIVES
From Brewster Rockit:



And my personal ObamaCare counseling invitation:

(with apologies to the cemetary; the mailing just happened to arrive at the right time)
OBAMACARE IS DEAD?
Maybe it’s time to start reading HR3200, the Republican alternative, which can be found here. As with the Democrat’s bill, it is only 1,000 pages long, which (to me) says it’s also problematic.
WHY ARE LIBERALS STILL ANGRY?
The most fundamental principle liberals have is that they are all very, very smart, and everyone should listen to them. Nothing angers them more than [having someone challenge] them.
Heh.
CLUELESSNESS
"Profits are not taken off the top but are what’s left at the bottom, after expenses get paid — and expenses are the 'overhead,' which includes items like salaries, supplies, rent, and so on."
"By the way, that’s why it’s called 'the bottom line,' because that’s where people find the profits in a ledger. Profits come last."
WIMP OR WARRIOR?
Yes.
GRADING THE QDR
The 2010 QDR seeks to answer the question of whether the US should posture its forces and focus its acquisitions on dealing with conventional threats from rising peer competitors or more asymmetric threats emanating from weak and failing states.The QDR is, at its best, a difficult high-wire act with no safety net, long on good intentions and short on successful actions. Given the dramatic philosophical difference between the Bush and Obama administrations and the demonstrated incompetence of the Obama administration with respect to its domestic agenda, dead on arrival looks right.
The search for answers is being structured around the concept of "hybrid warfare," ... a concept ... so loosely defined that it does not provide clear criteria for decision-making. Service efforts to define it have so far been little more that shopping lists for every possible contingency mixed with buzzwords that appear to have meaning only as long as they are not examined in any detail.
In practice, any concept that effectively justifies anything ends in justifying absolutely nothing.
THE PROBLEM WITH YOU CONSERVATIVES
This would be funny if it weren't almost word-for-word the Pacifica radio script I listened to last month.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
ACORN FALLS; PELOSI CLUELESS
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is clueless, which I wouldn’t have believed possible.
As Glenn Reynolds usually puts it, ”The country’s in the very best of hands.”
IT’S AUTUMN AND THE ACORNS ARE FALLING
Jon Stewart (skip to 05:00) wondered where the media was; and (finally) a major newspaper has taken a (squishy) stand, rebuking ACORN while decrying O’Keefe’s and Giles’ method as “distasteful.”
Commenter The Grey Man gets the last word: “Why are these methods “distasteful”? And why is ... [the MSM] ... being so elitist? O’Keefe and [his] partner are merely poor, undocumented journalists doing the work that regular American journalists do not want to do. I think Congress should enact legislation to give ... undocumented [journalists] amnesty, or at least a pathway to full journalism.”
TWELVE STEPS TO SANITY
“I no longer feel any political party or representative in Washington represents my views or works to pursue the issues important to me.”
One, illegal immigration. [S]top coddling illegal immigrants and secure our borders.
Two, the TARP bill. Freeze, repeal.
Three, Czars. Fire the czars.
Four, cap and trade. The debate on global warming is not over.
Five, universal healthcare. Slow down. Don't you dare try to pass this in the middle of the night.
Six, growing government control. Shrink it down. I want less government, not more.
Seven, ACORN. I want them investigated.
Eight, redistribution of wealth. No, no, no. I work for my money. It is mine.
Nine, charitable contributions. Charity belongs in our local communities. Butt out.
Ten, corporate bailouts. Knock it off. [Let them} sink or swim like the rest of us.
Eleven, transparency and accountability. How about it? [G]ive the buzzwords a rest and have some straight honest talk.
Twelve, unprecedented quick spending. Stop it now.
“Democrat, Republican, independent, libertarian. Understand this. We don't care. We are going to fire all of you who abuse power and seek more. It is not your power. It is ours and we want it back..”
Well said.
SCRAP THE EUROPEAN MISSILE SHIELD
European reaction is mixed. Russia applauds the policy change; Poland and the Czech Republic are relieved not to be targets, but have based much of their future security policy on getting the missile defenses from the United States.
The immediate reaction in the US from the left is that the change "makes strategic sense;" from the right, the reaction appears to be that “[t]his represents a complete capitulation to Russia's Vladimir Putin, who had demanded that the proposed deployments be halted as a price for improved relations.” Instapundit put it this way: ”It really is like Jimmy Carter all over again. Well, actually that’s looking like a best-case scenario these days.”
I doubt it’s as bad as the right's position makes it to be, since the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) is in fact still a developmental system, but the “sell-out” image does leave a bad taste.