•The data appears to be largely, perhaps entirely, authentic.Some of the emails are here; and a searchable database of all of emails is here. Expect to see much more as bloggers continue digging.
•The emails are incendiary.
•The implications shake the scientific basis for AGW, and the scientific reputations of some of AGW’s major proponents, to their roots.
Charlie Martin comments on the computer codes.
And, finally, because of the media's lack of interest, should it be called CLIMAQUIDDICK?