Thursday, May 12, 2011
ANOTHER RANDOM THOUGHT: Has it occurred to anyone that the environmental movement always emphasizes risks that support their political ambitions for more environmental regulation - and ignore those that don’t (nothing to see here; move along now)?
Following that train of thought, mightn’t it be better for the American public to have smaller, less ‘regulatory-able’ federal and state governments? With a lessened ability of activists to achieve their ambitions via regulation, we might then be privy to more realistic risk assessment of our lifestyle choices.
Following that train of thought, mightn’t it be better for the American public to have smaller, less ‘regulatory-able’ federal and state governments? With a lessened ability of activists to achieve their ambitions via regulation, we might then be privy to more realistic risk assessment of our lifestyle choices.
FLORIDA LEGISLATURE accidentally outlaws sex. I’d recommend that the legislators get real jobs, but the evidence suggests that they’re not qualified.
“THE FUNDAMENTAL FLAW at the core of ObamaCare is the mistaken belief that the government can spend your dollars more effectively than you can. This tragically pessimistic belief views all Americans with suspicion as either incompetent or unrighteous but either way in need of big-government control.”
Read it all.
Read it all.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)