SKUNK WORKS P-791 AIRSHIP revived as civil cargo-lifter. At the time I was working for the Skunk Works, P791 was a risk reduction effort for an even larger version tentatively named the AeroCraft.
The video is here.
Monday, April 04, 2011
THE OBVIOUS ELUDES HIM AGAIN: Chris Matthews wonders why Republicans distrust the ‘Mainstream Media’.
HOW TO MAKE A PAPER AIRPLANE. It doesn't seem like much until you see the scale at which the robot operates. Linked from Popular Science.
FORMER VIRGINIA GOV. TIM KAINE set to anounce Senate bid. Good. Now we can kick him out of politics entirely.
GOP REP. PAUL RYAN'S BUDGET PLAN to slash deficits by over $4 trillion. It sounds good, but I want to see details. And as an over-65er, I'd like to be included in the Medicare reforms he's proposing.
RETURN TO THE MOON: we need the gas for exploration.
This should put the environmental movement in a tizzy.
This should put the environmental movement in a tizzy.
BIASED MATH? Michael Barone comments:
An interesting result from pollster Scott Rasmussen: 57% of voters say they think making deeper cuts in federal spending is more important than avoiding a partial government shutdown, while 31% disagree. I think this wording tends to make a favorable case for the position of the House Republican leadership; it speaks of a “partial government shutdown” rather than a “government shutdown.” But in fact any shutdown would be partial in accordance with exiting law, and a margin of almost 2-1 is pretty striking.Heh.I argued a month ago, in my March 1 Examiner column, that the conventional wisdom was wrong about the political effect of the government shutdowns during the 1995-96 budget struggles between Newt Gingrich and Bill Clinton, and as one piece of evidence citing similar results on this question from an earlier Rasmussen poll. I continue to marvel at how Washington insiders regard the 1995-96 events as a disaster for House Republicans when they lost only 9 seats at the next election—especially since many of these people don’t seem to regard the House Democrats’ loss of 63 seats in November 2010 as a disaster. In my perhaps biased view, 63 is a larger number than 9.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)