THE NEW YORK TIMES makes the case to repeal ObamaCare.

The overarching point of the [NYT] editorial is that if certain burdensome provisions of Obamacare are repealed, negative consequences would result. But those consequences wouldn’t exist in the first place were it not for Obamacare — which is a pretty good argument for repealing the whole darn thing.

Of course, they were arguing to not repeal it.