Instapundit comments.
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Foreign Policy magazine tends to be a liberal domain, so there’s lots to quibble about in the first 8 items, but they generally come off as reasonably thoughtful. But the ninth? The best that can be said is that Michael Lind, of the New America Foundation, has come unglued. Here is his contribution (in italics):
[T]the federal government is too small, not too large, and should be expanded. At the price of inefficiency, things which could be done more simply and efficiently by the federal government have been delegated to the states or subsidized private corporations.Name one thing - just one - that the federal government has ever done more simply or efficiently.
For example, hybrid federal-state programs like Medicaid and unemployment insurance are threatened by unstable state revenues, unlike purely federal programs like Social Security.Uh, Social Security is stable? Only Harry Reid doesn't recognize it is destined for eventual bankruptcy.
Tax-favored private retirement savings programs like IRAs and 401k's are riskier than Social Security and allow brokers to fleece unsuspecting clients with their fees. These programs should be shrunk and Social Security should be expanded.Not so. My social security check is not nearly as big as it could have been had I been allowed to invest privately what I paid in FICA taxes.
Medical cost inflation threatens both the efficient Medicare program and the dysfunctional, employer-based health insurance sector.Employer-based health “care” is dysfunctional because of government interference, not in spite of it.
The solution is cost controls, not rationing access to health care by Americans.Wrong again. Cost control is a means of rationing access.
In a rational country, the federal government would take over functions that never should have been shared with the states or off-loaded onto the private sector.Only if “rational” and “insane” are synonyms.
Higher federal taxes would be offset somewhat by lower state taxes and the abolition of tax subsidies for private insurance and private retirement savings.It’s sufficient to just say “higher federal taxes.”
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
CALM. Not a single visual of chest-beating or wild grief. Sorrow itself has been elevated.Better us to learn from them than them to learn from us.DIGNITY. Disciplined queues for water and groceries. Not a rough word or a crude gesture. Their patience is admirable and praiseworthy.
ABILITY. The incredible architects, for instance. Buildings swayed but didn't fall.
GRACE. (Selflessness) People bought only what they needed for the present, so everybody could get something.
ORDER. No looting in shops. No honking and no overtaking on the roads. Just understanding.
SACRIFICE. Fifty workers stayed back to pump sea water in the N-reactors. How will they ever be repaid?
TENDERNESS. Restaurants cut prices. An unguarded ATM is left alone. The strong cared for the weak.
TRAINING. The old and the children, everyone knew exactly what to do. And they did just that.
MEDIA. They showed magnificent restraint in the bulletins. No silly reporters. Only calm reportage. Most of all - NO POLITICIANS TRYING TO GET CHEAP MILEAGE.
CONSCIENCE. When the power went off in a store, people put things back on the shelves and left quietly.
Unless you’re a Democrat (and then you won’t listen).
Author Gerald E. Scorse is typical of the progressive mindset: it's the government's money, just loaned to you provided that you use it "rightly."
My sentiments as well.
Oh, to be young - and dream - again.
