FROM MY EMAIL: some advice about 'punching back twice as hard' when spammers come calling:

1) Any time you see an email that says "forward this on to '10' (or however many) of your friends", "sign this petition", or "you'll get bad luck" or "you'll get good luck" or "you'll see something funny on your screen after you send it" or whatever --- it almost always has an email tracker program attached that tracks the cookies and emails of those folks you forward to. The host sender is getting a copy each time it gets forwarded and then is able to get lists of 'active' email addresses to use in SPAM emails or sell to other Spammers. Even when you get emails that demand you send the email on if you're not ashamed of God/Jesus --- that is email tracking, and they are playing on our conscience. These people don't care how they get your email addresses - just as long as they get them. Also, emails that talk about a missing child or a child with an incurable disease "how would you feel if that was your child" --- email tracking. Ignore them and don't participate!

2) Almost all emails that ask you to add your name and forward on to others are similar to that mass letter years ago that asked people to send business cards to the little kid in who wanted to break the Guinness Book of Records for the most cards. All it was, and all any of this type of email is, is a way to get names and 'cookie' tracking information for telemarketers and Spammers -- to validate active email accounts for their own profitable purposes.

3) Email petitions are NOT acceptable to Congress of any other organization - I.e. Social security, etc. To be acceptable, petitions must have a "signed signature"and full address of the person signing the petition, so this is a waste of time and you are just helping the email trackers.

Tips for Handling Telemarketers:

1) Say 'Hold On, Please...' while putting down your phone and walking off (instead of hanging-up immediately). Then go back and hang up when you eventually hear the phone company's 'beep-beep-beep' tone. This makes each telemarketing call so much more time-consuming that boiler room sales will grind to a halt if they continue to call.

2) Those annoying phone calls with no one on the other end are a telemarketing technique where a machine makes phone calls and records the time of day when a person answers the phone. This technique is used to determine the best time of day for a 'real' sales person to call back and get someone at home. After answering, immediately start hitting your # button on the phone, 6 or 7 times as quickly as possible. This confuses the machine that dialed the call, and it kicks your number out of their system.

Junk Mail Help:

1) When you get 'ads' enclosed with your phone or utility bill, return these 'ads' with your payment. Let the sending companies throw their own junk mail away. For junk mail with postage-paid return envelopes, why not get rid of some of your other junk mail and put it in these cool little, postage-paid return envelopes.

2) Let's help keep our postal service busy since they are saying that e-mail is cutting into their business profits, and that's why they need to increase postage costs again.

Save your sanity and help these folks go out of business sooner rather than later.

DEREK HUNTER: Our Disgraceful President. Courtesy of the 'reality-based community'.

TAKE THAT, MR. PRESIDENT:

"WHEN IT COMES TO ENERGY, President Obama wants us to use less and pay more. But the countries with the best human health and highest material wealth are those with high-energy consumption."

THEY'LL TURN US ALL INTO BEGGARS 'CAUSE THEY'RE EASIER TO PLEASE: Deliberate Dismantling of Welfare Reform.

THE REAL OBAMA steps forward.

Update: as predicted by Ayn Rand.

VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN CUCCINELLI "looks ahead" at ObamaCare's future in a "Cuccinelli Compass" newsletter. I posted an earlier Cuccinelli reaction to the Supreme Court decision; it can be found here.

Today, as we look ahead, there are two subjects for the states, including Virginia's Governor and legislature. And there's one issue left for us citizens - repeal.

For the States

This past week I briefed about 1/3 of all of our Virginia legislators - Republicans and Democrats - about the choices they have before them on two issues: 1) whether to expand Medicaid under the federal healthcare law; and 2) whether Virginia should set up its own healthcare exchange, or simply default to the federal exchange that will be set up if Virginia does not act.

My own position on both questions is that Virginia should NOT proceed with either undertaking. Once you decide, you should contact your Senator and Delegate to let them know what you think.

Medicaid

As of November, 2010, Virginia had approximately 850,000 Virginians receiving Medicaid. That's about 10% of all Virginians.

The proposed ObamaCare expansion of Medicaid would add somewhere between 270,000 & 420,000 new recipients to our Medicaid rolls. That's approximately a 40% increase!

Right now, Virginia spends about $3.7 billion of our state money on Medicaid, and the feds contribute about the same amount, for a total Medicaid expenditure in Virginia of about $7.4 billion.

One of the results of the Supreme Court's decision was to block the feds' threat to cut off Virginia's entire $3.7 billion of federal Medicaid money if we didn't enter into the massive Medicaid expansion. That threat didn't leave Virginia with much choice; however, now we can choose on the merits whether to undertake the Medicaid expansion.

The feds are still using a lot of bait to try and coax states to choose to undertake the expansion. For the first three years, 2014-16, the feds say they will cover 100% of the costs of providing Medicaid to the new additions. However, starting in 2015, we have to pay 50% of the administration costs.

In 2015, the admin costs will be approximately $10 million, then about $20 million in 2016 and gradually rising thereafter. Mind you, these promises are coming from a government - the federal government - that is broker than broke. If the federal government were a person, he'd have an annual salary of $22,000, be spending $38,000, and he'd have a credit card debt of about $162,000. Would you trust that guy to come through with promises to pay big bucks a few years down the road?

After 2016, Virginia picks up 5% of the cost of the new recipients rising to 10% by 2022, at which time, we'll be spending several hundred million more dollars every single year. So, the obvious question for those that want to the expansion is, "where is that money going to come from?" An already struggling transportation system? Higher taxes? Even President Obama says (well, he used to say...) that raising taxes on a struggling economy is a bad idea.

Looking backwards over time, it's important to know that Medicaid has exploded within the Virginia budget - from about 5% to nearly 20% today. And Virginia's experience is not unique in this regard. Medicaid has been eating out the other parts of the budget for years ... is this a part of the budget that we really want to voluntarily grow?

I hope not. Not if I were Governor.

There is no deadline (yet) for Virginia to make this decision. However, once we get in, we're at the mercy of the federal government. If we want to get out once we're in, we have to get their permission. What do you suppose are the odds of that?

Finally, ObamaCare was hoped by its proponents to cover 34 million Americans who are not now insured. Approximately 16 million of them were going to be covered under these Medicaid expansions. Of course, that doesn't "insure" them, rather it puts them on the welfare rolls. Nonetheless, ObamaCare was heavily reliant on this Medicaid expansion to achieve their purposes. Given that at least a half dozen Governors have already said their states won't participate, it's clear that this part of ObamaCare is not even going to achieve the goals of its proponents.

Healthcare Exchanges

A more complicated question is whether Virginia should set up its own healthcare exchange under ObamaCare. And there is a statutory deadline on this question: November 16th of this year - 10 days after election day. I said there's a "statutory deadline" because the law says one thing, but the administration is demonstrating their usual respect for laws - even their own laws - to suggest that the November 16th deadline may not be "final." They are looking at a regulation that would allow more time for states to decide to set up their own exchanges.

So, what are the issues to be considered?

For some federal laws that states administer, like the Clean Water Act, states have a lot of discretion about how to implement the law. That allows us to craft regulation that best fits Virginia. However, under ObamaCare, it is not clear that we would have much flexibility about how to implement an exchange. And if that's the case, why bother with a state exchange?

The current estimate for operating the exchanges is between $6-$25 million per year. And for what? To have the privilege of being the enforcement arm of a federal healthcare takeover that we don't agree with?

To add a VERY interesting wrinkle, there's a second consideration that's hard to get our arms around. It was first advanced by my friend, Michael Cannon, at the Cato Institute.

The text of ObamaCare has lots of mistakes in it, or at least they appear to be mistakes. One of them relates to the penalties that employers must pay if their employees end up in the healthcare exchange in their state.

Employers, you know, those folks that hire people and give them jobs? Yeah, those. Employers have to pay $2,000 or $3,000 penalties if their employees don't have health insurance that meets the federal standard and who end up in the healthcare exchanges.

Or maybe not ...

Warning: read slowly - double negative coming ...

The text of ObamaCare does not apply the penalties to employers whose states do not set up the healthcare exchanges.

Let me say that differently. Under the text of ObamaCare, for those states that do not set up their own healthcare exchanges and instead default to the federal exchanges, their employers will not have to pay the two or three thousand dollar penalties per employee.

Those employer penalties were expected to be the financing source for the folks that ended up in the healthcare exchanges. Whoops.

So, if Virginia does NOT set up a healthcare exchange under ObamaCare, then Virginia's employers that do not conform their insurance to the "minimum requirements" of ObamaCare will have a defense against paying the stiff penalties.

Naturally, the Obama administration is trying to counter this. They are passing an IRS regulation that purports to "fix" this problem. However, it is basic law that statutes trump regulations ... of course, that assumes that courts uphold the laws as written. What a concept.

Last, But Definitely Not Least - Repeal

I'll be blunt (something new for me).

One "advantage" of how the Supreme Court upheld ObamaCare is this: because they upheld the law as a tax, it only takes 50 Senators and a Vice-President to repeal ObamaCare, not 60.

Why? Because a bill to repeal a tax (ObamaCare is now a tax) is a revenue bill, it is not subject to filibuster. Thus, a simple majority will do the trick.

Wow. This means it's in our hands now.

Governor Romney has long been saying he'd repeal ObamaCare, but to do that a repeal bill would have to get through the Congress and to his Presidential desk.

Under any ordinary ruling by the Supreme Court, that would have taken 60 votes to get by a Senate filibuster. However, because the Supreme Court only upheld ObamaCare as a tax, we don't need to get to 60!

I don't think it was ever reasonable to think we could get to 60 votes for repeal even with a great year in the 2012 Senate races. But 50! We can get to 50!

Virginia is going to be a big part of that 50, with a hot race between George Allen and Tim Kaine that can help us get one of the small number of votes we need to get to repeal! And Tim Kaine was ObamaCare's biggest cheerleader and he hasn't backed away from it even as we've all learned that it's much worse than it even appeared when it passed.

Needless to say, George Allen has been hammering away about repealing the law.

So, here in Virginia, we're a swing state in the Presidential race AND we have one of a small number of Senate races that will help decide repeal.

It's in our hands folks! So don't sit on the couch between now and November.

If you're interested, you can subscribe to the Cuccinelli Compass here.

THE FIVE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT: Fraud, Waste, Abuse, Duplication, and Stupidity.

OH GREAT, yet another new EPA regulation making things more expensive for everyone.

IF A CONSERVATIVE SPEAKS IN THE FOREST ... no one will listen. PJ Media's Sarah Hoyt on nationalized healthcare.

DEMAND FOR nearly half a million new airline pilots over the next 20 years raises concerns that pilot quality could suffer.

It looks like I was overly pessimistic last year.

A CLOWN SHOW on voter identification laws. The Department of Justice may win in a court of law, but they will surely lose in the court of public opinion.

YEP, IT'S BETTER TO LET THE HOMELESS STARVE than risk them getting sick or being embarrassed.

Or being freed from government slavery?

THEY'LL TURN US ALL INTO BEGGARS 'CAUSE THEY'RE EASIER TO PLEASE: Government wants more people on food stamps.

UPDATE: USDA moves to end questionable food stamp ads.

For those who are truly in need, I'm all for encouraging them to apply. But let's face it, the Obama administration is only interested in the poor to the extent that they can be coerced to vote Democrat.

SHARK SIGHTINGS INCREASE. Quick, blame those Republican seals.

IF YOU READ/WATCH THE LIBERAL MEDIA, you'd think Mitt Romney intentionally insulted the NAACP Convention audience at every opportunity.

Here's the actual transcript of his speech.

THOMAS SOWELL: Invincible Lies, Part I and Part II.

JAY NORDLINGER on the Supreme Court, the separation of powers, and political pressure.

MICHAEL BARONE: Obamacare survives, but the political playing field has changed. This is an older commentary, dating back to the Supreme Court decision, but I think it illustrates that the times, they are a'changin. My sense is that political power is clearly shifting in favor of the Tenth Amendment and State's rights.

KATIE KIEFFER: "With the Obama administration’s drone policy, I believe we risk asymmetric blowback, defy foreign sovereignty, and—most alarmingly—violate our own Constitution." Overblown? Perhaps so, but there's certainly room for discussion, although that won't happen as long as the current administration is in power.