The ruling distorts the Executive Order beyond recognition, accusing the president of usurping legislative authority despite the order’s express adherence to “existing law.” Moreover, undeterred by the inconvenience that the order has not been enforced, the activist court — better to say, the fantasist court — dreams up harms that might befall San Francisco and Santa Clara, the sanctuary jurisdictions behind the suit, if it were enforced. The court thus flouts the standing doctrine, which limits judicial authority to actual controversies involving concrete, non-speculative harms.Isn't it time to start impeaching activist judges?
Friday, April 28, 2017
SHOWBOATING: federal judge suspends Trump’s unenforced ban on funding for sanctuary cities.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment