Tuesday, July 31, 2012
The progressives won control of the Democrat party in 2006, won the Presidency and Congress in 2008, and promptly imploded with their starry-eyed, narcissistic incompetence. The 2010 election was a strong rebuke to the progressives, which they refused to accept, and 2012 will be a watershed election where Americans will take back their government. In 2014, I expect (hope) that Americans will complete the process by tossing out the entrenched on both sides of the political spectrum.
Ease of living and the stupid Cyclops eye of media meteorologists have Americans into weather wimps. The wimpiest live in Washington, D.C., and environs. In a continental nation subject to hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, floods, blizzards, and heat waves, the least jog out of the normal -- a few flakes of snow, for instance -- shuts the nation's capitol down. Recent high winds -- with a fancy Spanish name (derecho) like a cheap sports car -- caused real havoc, but were treated like the end of the world. The wind's force multiplier was the local utility, Potomac Electric Power Company (Pepco), which was a day late and a dollar short in clean-up. There was ample power, though, for handwringing, some of it coming from conservatives (Farewell? A long farewell to all my greatness!). Here's a suggestion: Next time there is a spot of bad weather, could everybody just do his job, and suck it up?From the dead-tree edition of National Review (July 30, 2012).
Linked from the PJ Tatler.
And racism is the real reason why Romney went to Poland.
Monday, July 30, 2012
Racism is not dead, but it is on life support -- kept alive by politicians, race hustlers and people who get a sense of superiority by denouncing others as "racists."Read them all.
One of the arguments for Medicare is that the elderly don't want to be a burden to their children. Apparently it is all right to be a burden to other people's children, who are paying taxes.
[Added: my wife thinks I'm insulting the cats. Apologies to Diamond, Daisy, and Shadow.]
Read it all for more mockery of the liberal left.
it's that the progressive activists have moved so far left that the center appears to have moved right.
Times have changed indeed.
Sunday, July 29, 2012
Best comment: "Large-breasted women will only be permitted to dispense milk in 16oz increments."
Historical Notes: the Environmental Protection Agency was created December 2, 1970. And ObamaCare, if not repealed, will be implemented in earnest in 2014.
Best comment: "How do we tighten Bloomberg's grip on reality?"
Saturday, July 28, 2012
The article is interesting in itself, but what I found noteworthy were two items:
1} Myopia is 'short-sightedness'. I'm myopic, and I've been near-sighted for as long as I can remember. I wonder if people with hyperopia know they're now 'long-sighted' instead of far-sighted.
2) Myopia is a 'disease'. In today's world, anything short of perfection must be a disease and subject to control by our betters.
I didn't sign on.
Friday, July 27, 2012
One of the tricks of professional magicians is to distract the audience's attention from what they are doing while they are creating an illusion of magic.Which is the point of Obama's rhetoric; to distract Americans from his collectivist leanings.
The whole point of the collectivist mindset is to concentrate power in the hands of the collectivists....And make freedom disappear.
Beware of the wages of professed purity, whether religious or environmental -- whether it targets a mausoleum in Timbuktu or a stone arched bridge in Yosemite.Or a Christian cross in La Jolla. They want to destroy history because it refutes their belief that they alone know what is right and proper and true.
Thursday, July 26, 2012
I'd strongly recommend young Mr. Sarlin delve into the history of the internet. Not only did his idol Al Gore not invent the internet, neither did the government. The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) certainly did have a hand in developing the data protocols for sending binary data over telephone lines, but the development of the commercial internet was at best not hindered by our far-seeing, all-knowing government interlocutors.
UPDATE & BUMP: Here's more on the government 'invention' of the internet.
[T]he Administrative Procedures Act, longstanding federal law that governs the process by which federal agencies make rules for the industries they regulate, is very strict about when and how officials may share their thinking about future regulations.No expertise required ....
“Under the Administrative Procedures Act, we cannot discuss what a proposed regulation might look like, and so that kind of hinders us in talking to industry,” Melroy said.
So even as AST prepares to tap industry experts for their take on launch, flight and passenger safety, the office has set certain ground rules to avoid running afoul of the law.
“We can’t propose anything, we can’t tell people what we think the answer is, or anything like that,” Melroy said. “But we can tee up a subject and then let people talk to us, and that will help us understand if we’re on the right track or not.”
Requiring one to take responsibility for his/her own actions -- what a novel idea....
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
And the shortest book of them all ....MY BLACK GIRLFRIENDS
By Tiger Woods
---------------
THINGS I LOVE ABOUT MY COUNTRY
By Jane Fonda, Cindy Sheehan & Michelle Obama
Illustrated by Michael Moore
Foreword by George Soros
---------------
MY CHRISTIAN ACCOMPLISHMENTS & HOW I HELPED AFTER KATRINA
By "The Rev" Jesse Jackson & "The Rev" Al Sharpton
---------------
THINGS I LOVE ABOUT BILL
By Hillary Clinton
---------------
THINGS I LOVE ABOUT HILLARY
By Bill Clinton
---------------
THINGS I CANNOT AFFORD
By Bill Gates
---------------
THINGS I WOULD NOT DO FOR MONEY
By Dennis Rodman
---------------
THINGS WE KNOW TO BE TRUE
By Al Gore & John Kerry
---------------
GUIDE TO THE PACIFIC
By Amelia Earhart
---------------
HOW TO LIVE LIFE TO THE FULLEST
By Dr. Jack Kevorkian
---------------
TO ALL THE MEN WE HAVE LOVED BEFORE
By Ellen de Generes & Rosie O'Donnell
---------------
GUIDE TO DATING ETIQUETTE
By Mike Tyson
---------------
MY PLAN TO FIND THE REAL KILLERS
By O. J. Simpson & Casey Anthony
---------------
HOW TO DRINK & DRIVE SAFELY
By Ted Kennedy
---------------
By Bill Clinton
Introduction by The Rev. Jesse Jackson
Foreword by Tiger Woods with John Edwards
---------------
HOW TO WIN A SUPERBOWL
By The Buffalo Bills
---------------
MY COMPLETE KNOWLEDGE OF MILITARY STRATEGY
By Nancy Pelosi
THINGS I DID TO DESERVE THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZEFrom my email.
By Barack Obama
Friday, July 20, 2012
Thursday, July 19, 2012
It's not often that residents of the District of Columbia get to brag about our local government, but this is one of those moments when we are leading the nation. We in the capital are on the cutting edge of entropy.Milbank does have occasional bouts of sanity when it's his ox being gored, but here's the rub: he won't vote to kick the bastards out because D.C. is a one-party town and Milbank refuses to vote in the Democrat primary (lest he be thought of as biased, you see). So rather that taking part in reforming his vaunted party, he whines that he's disenfranchised by ... the Tea Party and Republicans!
Even perennial contenders such as Louisana and New Jersey can't compete with the record of dysfunction and corruption we have compiled in recent weeks.
Kojo Nnamdi (D.C. resident and NPR radio talk show host) agrees D.C. is corrupt, but -- wait for it -- it's Congress' fault for not making the District of Columbia America's 51st state.
You have to read it to believe it.
1) Any time you see an email that says "forward this on to '10' (or however many) of your friends", "sign this petition", or "you'll get bad luck" or "you'll get good luck" or "you'll see something funny on your screen after you send it" or whatever --- it almost always has an email tracker program attached that tracks the cookies and emails of those folks you forward to. The host sender is getting a copy each time it gets forwarded and then is able to get lists of 'active' email addresses to use in SPAM emails or sell to other Spammers. Even when you get emails that demand you send the email on if you're not ashamed of God/Jesus --- that is email tracking, and they are playing on our conscience. These people don't care how they get your email addresses - just as long as they get them. Also, emails that talk about a missing child or a child with an incurable disease "how would you feel if that was your child" --- email tracking. Ignore them and don't participate!Tips for Handling Telemarketers:
2) Almost all emails that ask you to add your name and forward on to others are similar to that mass letter years ago that asked people to send business cards to the little kid in who wanted to break the Guinness Book of Records for the most cards. All it was, and all any of this type of email is, is a way to get names and 'cookie' tracking information for telemarketers and Spammers -- to validate active email accounts for their own profitable purposes.
3) Email petitions are NOT acceptable to Congress of any other organization - I.e. Social security, etc. To be acceptable, petitions must have a "signed signature"and full address of the person signing the petition, so this is a waste of time and you are just helping the email trackers.
1) Say 'Hold On, Please...' while putting down your phone and walking off (instead of hanging-up immediately). Then go back and hang up when you eventually hear the phone company's 'beep-beep-beep' tone. This makes each telemarketing call so much more time-consuming that boiler room sales will grind to a halt if they continue to call.Junk Mail Help:
2) Those annoying phone calls with no one on the other end are a telemarketing technique where a machine makes phone calls and records the time of day when a person answers the phone. This technique is used to determine the best time of day for a 'real' sales person to call back and get someone at home. After answering, immediately start hitting your # button on the phone, 6 or 7 times as quickly as possible. This confuses the machine that dialed the call, and it kicks your number out of their system.
1) When you get 'ads' enclosed with your phone or utility bill, return these 'ads' with your payment. Let the sending companies throw their own junk mail away. For junk mail with postage-paid return envelopes, why not get rid of some of your other junk mail and put it in these cool little, postage-paid return envelopes.Save your sanity and help these folks go out of business sooner rather than later.
2) Let's help keep our postal service busy since they are saying that e-mail is cutting into their business profits, and that's why they need to increase postage costs again.
Wednesday, July 18, 2012
Today, as we look ahead, there are two subjects for the states, including Virginia's Governor and legislature. And there's one issue left for us citizens - repeal.If you're interested, you can subscribe to the Cuccinelli Compass here.
For the States
This past week I briefed about 1/3 of all of our Virginia legislators - Republicans and Democrats - about the choices they have before them on two issues: 1) whether to expand Medicaid under the federal healthcare law; and 2) whether Virginia should set up its own healthcare exchange, or simply default to the federal exchange that will be set up if Virginia does not act.
My own position on both questions is that Virginia should NOT proceed with either undertaking. Once you decide, you should contact your Senator and Delegate to let them know what you think.
Medicaid
As of November, 2010, Virginia had approximately 850,000 Virginians receiving Medicaid. That's about 10% of all Virginians.
The proposed ObamaCare expansion of Medicaid would add somewhere between 270,000 & 420,000 new recipients to our Medicaid rolls. That's approximately a 40% increase!
Right now, Virginia spends about $3.7 billion of our state money on Medicaid, and the feds contribute about the same amount, for a total Medicaid expenditure in Virginia of about $7.4 billion.
One of the results of the Supreme Court's decision was to block the feds' threat to cut off Virginia's entire $3.7 billion of federal Medicaid money if we didn't enter into the massive Medicaid expansion. That threat didn't leave Virginia with much choice; however, now we can choose on the merits whether to undertake the Medicaid expansion.
The feds are still using a lot of bait to try and coax states to choose to undertake the expansion. For the first three years, 2014-16, the feds say they will cover 100% of the costs of providing Medicaid to the new additions. However, starting in 2015, we have to pay 50% of the administration costs.
In 2015, the admin costs will be approximately $10 million, then about $20 million in 2016 and gradually rising thereafter. Mind you, these promises are coming from a government - the federal government - that is broker than broke. If the federal government were a person, he'd have an annual salary of $22,000, be spending $38,000, and he'd have a credit card debt of about $162,000. Would you trust that guy to come through with promises to pay big bucks a few years down the road?
After 2016, Virginia picks up 5% of the cost of the new recipients rising to 10% by 2022, at which time, we'll be spending several hundred million more dollars every single year. So, the obvious question for those that want to the expansion is, "where is that money going to come from?" An already struggling transportation system? Higher taxes? Even President Obama says (well, he used to say...) that raising taxes on a struggling economy is a bad idea.
Looking backwards over time, it's important to know that Medicaid has exploded within the Virginia budget - from about 5% to nearly 20% today. And Virginia's experience is not unique in this regard. Medicaid has been eating out the other parts of the budget for years ... is this a part of the budget that we really want to voluntarily grow?
I hope not. Not if I were Governor.
There is no deadline (yet) for Virginia to make this decision. However, once we get in, we're at the mercy of the federal government. If we want to get out once we're in, we have to get their permission. What do you suppose are the odds of that?
Finally, ObamaCare was hoped by its proponents to cover 34 million Americans who are not now insured. Approximately 16 million of them were going to be covered under these Medicaid expansions. Of course, that doesn't "insure" them, rather it puts them on the welfare rolls. Nonetheless, ObamaCare was heavily reliant on this Medicaid expansion to achieve their purposes. Given that at least a half dozen Governors have already said their states won't participate, it's clear that this part of ObamaCare is not even going to achieve the goals of its proponents.
Healthcare Exchanges
A more complicated question is whether Virginia should set up its own healthcare exchange under ObamaCare. And there is a statutory deadline on this question: November 16th of this year - 10 days after election day. I said there's a "statutory deadline" because the law says one thing, but the administration is demonstrating their usual respect for laws - even their own laws - to suggest that the November 16th deadline may not be "final." They are looking at a regulation that would allow more time for states to decide to set up their own exchanges.
So, what are the issues to be considered?
For some federal laws that states administer, like the Clean Water Act, states have a lot of discretion about how to implement the law. That allows us to craft regulation that best fits Virginia. However, under ObamaCare, it is not clear that we would have much flexibility about how to implement an exchange. And if that's the case, why bother with a state exchange?
The current estimate for operating the exchanges is between $6-$25 million per year. And for what? To have the privilege of being the enforcement arm of a federal healthcare takeover that we don't agree with?
To add a VERY interesting wrinkle, there's a second consideration that's hard to get our arms around. It was first advanced by my friend, Michael Cannon, at the Cato Institute.
The text of ObamaCare has lots of mistakes in it, or at least they appear to be mistakes. One of them relates to the penalties that employers must pay if their employees end up in the healthcare exchange in their state.
Employers, you know, those folks that hire people and give them jobs? Yeah, those. Employers have to pay $2,000 or $3,000 penalties if their employees don't have health insurance that meets the federal standard and who end up in the healthcare exchanges.
Or maybe not ...
Warning: read slowly - double negative coming ...
The text of ObamaCare does not apply the penalties to employers whose states do not set up the healthcare exchanges.
Let me say that differently. Under the text of ObamaCare, for those states that do not set up their own healthcare exchanges and instead default to the federal exchanges, their employers will not have to pay the two or three thousand dollar penalties per employee.
Those employer penalties were expected to be the financing source for the folks that ended up in the healthcare exchanges. Whoops.
So, if Virginia does NOT set up a healthcare exchange under ObamaCare, then Virginia's employers that do not conform their insurance to the "minimum requirements" of ObamaCare will have a defense against paying the stiff penalties.
Naturally, the Obama administration is trying to counter this. They are passing an IRS regulation that purports to "fix" this problem. However, it is basic law that statutes trump regulations ... of course, that assumes that courts uphold the laws as written. What a concept.
Last, But Definitely Not Least - Repeal
I'll be blunt (something new for me).
One "advantage" of how the Supreme Court upheld ObamaCare is this: because they upheld the law as a tax, it only takes 50 Senators and a Vice-President to repeal ObamaCare, not 60.
Why? Because a bill to repeal a tax (ObamaCare is now a tax) is a revenue bill, it is not subject to filibuster. Thus, a simple majority will do the trick.
Wow. This means it's in our hands now.
Governor Romney has long been saying he'd repeal ObamaCare, but to do that a repeal bill would have to get through the Congress and to his Presidential desk.
Under any ordinary ruling by the Supreme Court, that would have taken 60 votes to get by a Senate filibuster. However, because the Supreme Court only upheld ObamaCare as a tax, we don't need to get to 60!
I don't think it was ever reasonable to think we could get to 60 votes for repeal even with a great year in the 2012 Senate races. But 50! We can get to 50!
Virginia is going to be a big part of that 50, with a hot race between George Allen and Tim Kaine that can help us get one of the small number of votes we need to get to repeal! And Tim Kaine was ObamaCare's biggest cheerleader and he hasn't backed away from it even as we've all learned that it's much worse than it even appeared when it passed.
Needless to say, George Allen has been hammering away about repealing the law.
So, here in Virginia, we're a swing state in the Presidential race AND we have one of a small number of Senate races that will help decide repeal.
It's in our hands folks! So don't sit on the couch between now and November.
Tuesday, July 17, 2012
It looks like I was overly pessimistic last year.
Or being freed from government slavery?
UPDATE: USDA moves to end questionable food stamp ads.
For those who are truly in need, I'm all for encouraging them to apply. But let's face it, the Obama administration is only interested in the poor to the extent that they can be coerced to vote Democrat.
Here's the actual transcript of his speech.
Monday, July 16, 2012
Taken from this post.
Random thought. Why is it that all we hear from the Obama administration is about taxing the 'evil' fat cats on Wall Street and never about taxing the Hollywood moguls, nor sports and entertainment stars?
Sunday, July 15, 2012
Even remedial economics is too much for progressives.
No, I built it despite your best efforts.
I'm reminded of Eddie Chiles' "I'm mad too, Eddie!" bumper stickers and radio commentaries from the 1970's. He was also widely quoted as saying "The government should protect our shores and leave us alone" but I haven't been able (yet) to find any references to that popular sentiment.
Michelle Malkin has more. And Virginia's Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has some additional thoughts.
Saturday, July 14, 2012
Read it all.
Friday, July 13, 2012
Technically, that's true, but the problem is that the actual minimum wage is the hourly equivalent of welfare, unemployment benefits, and tax credits for the poor.
... can politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $45,000 a plate campaign fund raising event.From my email.
... can people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when we have a black President, a black Attorney General, and roughly 18% of the federal workforce is black, while only 12% of the population is black.
... can we have the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner, the head of the Treasury Department and Charles Rangel who once ran the Ways and Means Committee, BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who were in favor of higher taxes.
... can we have terrorists kill women and children in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be upset by the backlash.
... can we make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege, while we discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just become American citizens.
... can the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country's Constitution be thought of as "extremists."
... can you need to present a driver's license to cash a check, get a library card or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
... can people demand governments who take $.45 tax on a gallon of gas investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes in China (Nike).
... can the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a trillion dollars more than it has per year for total spending of $7 million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn't have nearly enough money.
... can the rich people who pay 86% of all income tax dollars be accused of not paying their "fair share" by the 51% of the population who don't pay any income taxes at all.
Thursday, July 12, 2012
My trend analysis of the Rasmussen Presidential Approval Index predicts that on election day 2012, only 17% of the electorate will 'strongly approve' Obama's performance; 46% will strongly disapprove, and 37% will neither strongly approve nor strongly disapprove.
If that middle third of the electorate breaks 2:1 for Obama (as the prior trending suggests it might), the election will be 58-42 for Romney.
Wednesday, July 11, 2012
He might want to tell the rest of us.
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Here's an opposing view.
Monday, July 09, 2012
So make 'em pay more.
ADDED: Bill Whittle on XCOR and the state of business in California and Texas.
Sunday, July 08, 2012
[For those] who may ... hesitate [to support Romney], keep four things in mind:So for any you who may be thinking of not voting because your favorite didn’t get nominated -- or writing in a candidate who can't win -- just imagine this possibility: 'Supreme Court Justice Eric Holder'.
1. Justice Scalia just turned 76.
2. Justice Kennedy will be 76 later this month.
3. Justice Breyer will be 76 in August.
4. Justice Ginsburg turned 80 last March.
Whomever we elect as president in November is almost certainly going to choose at least one and maybe more new members of the Supreme Court — in addition to hundreds of other life-tenured federal judges, all of whom will be making momentous decisions about our lives for decades to come. If you don’t think it matters whether the guy making those calls is Mitt Romney or Barack Obama, you're not of this world.
From my email.
Saturday, July 07, 2012
Friday, July 06, 2012
Thanks, Mr. President.
They'll turn us all into beggars 'cause they're easier to please.
Hat tip Instapundit.
Thursday, July 05, 2012
What truly angers me about this story is that the discrimination charge was filed by a 'retired electrical engineer' who was annoyed by the discount. First, because this twerp is an embarrassment to my chosen profession, and second, because he seems to think he has a right to not be annoyed.
Can I sue him because his mere existence (now that I know about it) annoys hell out of me? If he has a right not to be annoyed, then so do I.
When you've lost Instapundit, ... you've lost.
A decent analysis, but the problem with Mr. Greenberg's conclusion is that the word 'comprehensive' does not mean all at once. It means to have a plan, start somewhere, and then finish the job. Houses are not built 'comprehensively'; they start with a foundation and end with the decorator details.
That night we were eating dinner on the terrace at Madigan's on the Occoquan, watching the police search and rescue boat searching the river under the bridge. At the time, we didn't know what was happening; only when we left to find our car parked inside a police quarantine zone did we find out that it was a recovery mission.
Interestingly, the Dar AlNoor Islamic Community Center is less than 1/4 mile from the elementary school where my wife teaches.
MORE: Iran declared Wednesday that it can destroy nearby U.S. military bases and strike Israel within minutes of an attack on the Islamic Republic.
I would suggest that the U.S. respond by simply mooring an old barge painted with a target on its top a few miles offshore from Iran and then firing a single unarmed ICBM at it from U.S. soil. At that point, a simple note stating that 'we know where you are' should suffice.
Wednesday, July 04, 2012
Two hundred thirty-six years ago this Fourth of July, 57 men signed the document that created the American republic. They represented a people of about 3 million grouped in a series of 13 colonies along the eastern seaboard of the United States. They were all wanted men, sought by the commander of the British forces in North America for sedition and treason. He had behind him the resources of the greatest military power on earth. They had behind them the bare beginnings of a government, hardly anything of an army, but something mighty in the way of an idea.Excerpted from the July issue of Townhall Magazine.
This nation had therefore a desperate beginning. Who but the boldest could believe that the signers of the Declaration of Independence were laying the foundation of the greatest constitutional republic in history? Now that republic has spread across the continent, and its influence reaches around the world. Its population has increased a hundredfold. Its Constitution has provided government to a free people constantly growing in size and territory, each new state joining the union as an equal, its citizens never subjects, its people ever free. There is no story close to it in the history of man.
Statesmen and thinkers have attributed the strength and goodness of the nation to the principles in the Declaration. Many others have denied this. Statesmen and thinkers have proclaimed the Constitution a just and beautiful implementation of the principles of the Declaration. Many others have denied this. These denials are more common in times of crisis in our country. They are very common now.
It is a sign of our time that the sitting chief executive of our country eschews the permanent meaning of the Declaration and the idea of fixity in the Constitution. In the "Audacity of Hope," Barack Obama writes: "Implicit in [the Constitution's] structure, in the very idea of ordered liberty, was a rejection of absolute truth, the infallibility of any idea or ideology or theology or "ism," any tyrannical consistency that might lock future generations into a single, unalterable course. …"
Obama has stuck to this theme during his presidency. This May at Barnard College, he proclaimed the great virtue of the Constitution to be its openness to change: "It allowed for protests, movements, and the assimilation of new ideas that would repeatedly, decade after decade, change the world—a constant forward movement that continues to this day." There is neither form nor firmness. All is fluid, according to Obama, and this liberates us to do whatever we will.
America has gone very far down the trail that Obama is blazing. Right now, the expenditures of all government—state, local and federal—exceed 40 percent of the gross domestic product. If trends continue, the public sector will soon grow larger than the private sector, and then the government will have more resources than those it governs. ...
Just as the Founders did, so may anyone look for his rights under these "laws of nature and of nature's God." Anyone whose rights are denied will feel their weight. The Jew rounded up by the Nazis, the black slave held in Mississippi in 1840, may both look to this document as the charter by which he can advance. Thomas Jefferson, a slaveholder, was aware of this and wrote that indeed, "I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just." These principles place every man and woman deprived of their rights in the same place that the Founders occupied on July 4, 1776: they may appeal to an absolute truth, written in the nature of man and in the nature of things, against any power that will offend their rights. Perhaps they cannot find the strength to overcome their oppression. Never mind: their cause is still the just one. They will see, and even in moments of clarity their oppressors will see, that the great self-evident truth that all men are created equal means nothing more nor less than that all men are men. It means nothing less than that no one may rightly govern another except by his consent. It means that the purpose of government is to "secure these rights": "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
These are the principles of the United States. The fact that they were announced at the onset of its revolution, and the fact that the revolution proceeded in their name, seals them in the blood and the history of this land.