Wednesday, September 30, 2009
NAIVE AND EGOTISTICAL
This is news?
AN OFFICIALLY OFFICIAL AFGHANISTAN POLICY
And since it’s a policy decision, there’s clearly no need for military input.
Besides, there are more important things to do than succeed in Afghanistan.
OBAMACARE OR JAIL
People who fail to pay the $1,900 fee for not purchasing coverage under Obamacare would be charged with a misdemeanor, charged a penalty of up to $25,000 or face up to a year in jail.Will they get ObamaCare while in jail? And will they be required to pay for it?
A TOUGH SELL?
I suspect the “industry expert” will be very surprised.
HEALTH WORKERS SPURN FLU SHOTS
Do they know something we don’t?
LIBERALISM DEFINED
ADVICE FOR REPUBLICANS
THE BRAINY BUNCH
There is usually only a limited amount of damage that can be done by dull or stupid people. For creating a truly monumental disaster, you need people with high IQs.A case in point: Argentina
In an age when facts seem to carry less weight than the visions of brilliant and charismatic leaders, it is more important than ever to look at the actual track records of those brilliant and charismatic leaders.
Argentina began [the 20th] century as one of the 10 richest nations in the world [but] politically brilliant and charismatic leaders, promoting reckless government spending-- of whom Juan Peron was the most prominent, but by no means alone-- managed to create an economic disaster in a country with an abundance of natural resources.Read the rest of the article to find out where Sowell fears the U.S. might end.
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
BE CAREFUL WHEN ORDERING A SHOT
Oh, this should be interesting to watch over the next few months.
TAX BREAK FOR CATS
PetExemption.com founders Leo Grillo and Robert Davi are pleased that the Humanity and Pets Partnered Through the Years (“HAPPY”) Act was introduced last week in the U.S. House of Representatives. The legislation introduced by Rep. Thaddeus McCotter (R-MI) is a federal bill that would reward pet owners by allowing them to deduct up to $3,500 for pet care costs, including veterinary services.Why not just declare pets to be dependents? I’ll gladly take the $3500 standard deduction for Shadow, Daisy, and Diamond ....
AMERICA’S NEXT GREAT PUNDIT
[T]en prospective pundits will get to compete for the title of America’s Next Great Pundit, facing off in challenges that test the skills a modern pundit must possess.... The ultimate winner will get the opportunity to write a weekly column that may appear in the print and/or online editions of The Washington Post .... We’ll set our promising pundit on a path to become the next byline in demand ....
And join the ranks of Eugene Robinson? Dana Milbank? Richard Cohen? Ezra Klein?
No, thanks.
Link from Michelle Malkin.
MESSENGER GOES TO MERCURY
More images here.
WHEN SARKOZY MOCKED OBAMA
NO PUBLIC OPTION
A good beginning, but only a beginning.
THE BLOOM IS OFF THE ROSE (AGAIN)
Sooner or later it is going to occur to Barack Obama that he is the president of the United States. As of yet, though, he does not act that way, appearing promiscuously on television and granting interviews like the presidential candidate he no longer is. The election has been held, but the campaign goes on and on. The candidate has yet to become commander in chief.From Richard Cohen, one of the Washington Post’s chief Obama apologists, no less.
The trouble with Obama is that he gets into the moment and means what he says for that moment only. He meant what he said when he called Afghanistan a "war of necessity" -- and now is not necessarily so sure. He meant what he said about the public option in his health-care plan -- and then again maybe not. He would not prosecute CIA agents for getting rough with detainees -- and then again maybe he would.... [H]e gave Congress an August deadline for passage of health-care legislation -- and then let it pass.Cohen has belatedly recognized that every Obama promise -- every single one -- comes with an expiration date. What’s next? -- recognition that Obama will vote “present” until someone else is forced to make a decision -- and then “tut,tut” the decision with his (inevitably) perfect hindsight?
VOTING RIGHTS
Personally, I think no incumbent should be reelected.
WHEN IS A HATE CRIME A HATE CRIME?
WINDOW OF OPPORTUNISM
“Obama ... is not from Chicago. He is from the Land of Ambition. That is a storied realm where all the posted signs warn, ‘Don't Get Between Me and What I Want.’ Obama wants a second term, and neither racial fellowship nor bonhomie nor a touching consideration for the bruised feelings of others will, in the end, make a difference.”
Gov. Paterson, meet Obama’s bus.
Monday, September 28, 2009
HEALTH CARE EGO-TRIP
What's driving the great health debate of 2009 is not a popular clamor for universal insurance.... The underlying driver is politicians' psychological quest for glory.I’m afraid he’s right.
HEALTH CARE FOR ILLEGALS
I’m all for it. They should be required to purchase healthcare - in their native countries.
STILL WHINING AFTER ALL THESE YEARS
Funny, I don’t recall George W. Bush whining about a (half)-vast left-wing conspiracy targeting him for eight years ....
More proof that Democrats are adolescent whiners in need of parental discipline (a hockey mom, perhaps?).
OBAMALYMPICS
I’m of two minds on this one.
On the one hand, what the hell is Obama doing? He’s the President of the United States , for Christ’s sake, not a Chicago snake-oil salesman.
On the other hand, maybe it’s a good idea -- the more involved with trivia he is, the less damage he can do to America’s real national interests.
PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY
[Jill Abramson, the NYT managing editor for news] and Bill Keller, the executive editor, said last week that they would now assign an editor to monitor opinion media and brief them frequently on bubbling controversies. Keller declined to identify the editor, saying he wanted to spare that person "a bombardment of e-mails and excoriation in the blogosphere."Somehow, I think that the refusal to identify the editor is to protect him/her (and the New York Times) from being “bombarded” with facts, tips, research, stories, leads, etc., from the right side of the blogosphere. It’s hard to maintain plausible deniability of knowledge of a story when a hundred bloggers can post “Hey, I sent you a tip on ... and here’s the email to prove it.”
MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY
Oh, no. Absolutely. Not. Political.
Via Instapundit.
Sunday, September 27, 2009
FAULTY CONSERVATION
[E]ach acre of food we idle in the United States - just like every barrel of oil we don't pump - means we will import what we take for granted from somewhere else.TANSTAAFL.
We can be sure that even if we find the money to pay those who sell us our imported food and fuel, they will produce it in a lot messier fashion than we can ever imagine - ensuring a poorer America and a dirtier planet all at once.
NOWHERE TO GO BUT HOME ALONE
With the start of sixth grade this year, my son officially became a latchkey child. School lets out at 3:15. My husband and I both work and often don't get home until well after 6. [I]n elementary school, there were at least four different formal after-school programs that filled the gap between the end of his school day and the end of our workday [but] the little that [i]s available for his age group [i]sn't right for him.Well, she and her husband both work - doesn't that suggest something?
I found smug comments lamenting parents' love of two incomes over the well-being of their children. (Anybody bother to digest the statistic that nearly 80 percent of women with school-age children work outside the home? That's up from 55 percent in 1975. And my guess is they all love their children very much.)But did she think to look for data about what percent of women with school-age children had to work outside the home? Nope. She has a right to work outside the home, a right to have children, and a right to have the government take care of them.
[Ellie] Mitchell, director of the Maryland Out of School Time Network, argues, as does U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan, that the school day is outmoded. "After-school is always seen as something extra," she said. "But I don't know why 9 to 3 is so much more important than 3 to 6. It's all just the time that kids are not with their families."Doesn't she have a responsibility somewhere in all those rights?
[Update] It's illegal to be a good samaritan and do something liberals believe the government should be doing.
GOVERNMENT TRANSPARENCY
What Obama meant.
CAN SODA TAXES
1. Sin taxes are for our own good.
2. Soda is causing the obesity epidemic.
3. Soda taxes help everyone.
4. High-fructose corn syrup is extremely hazardous to your health.
5. Obesity is driving health-care costs up. A soda tax is just a user fee.
The myths are obvious, but go ahead and read the article for details.
WE, THE JOURNALISTS
The triumph of Nazi propaganda in this period is the subject of a remarkable exhibit at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum....
Ah, yes ... let’s start with the Nazi comparison, shall we?
[I]n the course of a few years, a fringe party was able to define a national community by scapegoating internal enemies; elevate a single, messianic leader; and keep the public docile with hatred....This obviously doesn’t apply to the Democrat party, right?
But it was radio that proved the most powerful tool.... “You were bombarded by information that you were unable to verify or critically evaluate. It was the Internet of its time,” [says Steve Luckert, curator at the HolocaustAh, yes, the “poor dumb masses” trope.
Museum]....
It is a disorienting atmosphere in which information is difficult to verify or critically evaluate, the rules of discourse are unclear, and emotion -- often expressed in CAPITAL LETTERS -- is primary. User-driven content on the Internet often consists of bullying, conspiracy theories and racial prejudice.... It ... allows hatred to invade respected institutional spaces on the Internet, gaining for these ideas a legitimacy denied to fringe Web sites.And “professional-driven” content doesn’t? (cf. “teabaggers”.)
Legally restricting such content ... is impossible. In America, the First Amendment protects blanket statements of bigotry. But this does not mean that popular news sites ... are constitutionally required to provide forums for bullies and bigots. As private institutions, they are perfectly free to set rules against racism and hatred. This is not censorship; it is the definition of standards.
And the standards should be set by?
Some online institutions, such as The New York Times and the Los Angeles Times, screen user comments ... to identify objectionable content.... [H]atred must be confined to the fringes of our culture -- as the hatred of other times should have been.
And just the Obama administration is full of “thin-skinned whiners”? Oh, ... never mind.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
MORE FROM MY EMAIL
I guess I must be on the wrong page …Cash for Clunkers is just another example of government failure to think through all the possible ramifications of a policy. My Three Laws of Systems Engineering apply, at least indirectly, in that the intended consequence was to demonstrate environmental sensitivity without regard to cost.
A vehicle at 15 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 800 gallons a year of gasoline. A vehicle at 25 mpg and 12,000 miles per year uses 480 gallons a year. So, the average clunker transaction will reduce US gasoline consumption by 320 gallons/year.
They claim 700,000 vehicles – so that's 224 million gallons/year. That equates to a bit over 5 million barrels of oil. Five million barrels of oil is about 1/4 of one day's US consumption. And 5 million barrels of oil costs about $350 million dollars at $70/bbl.
So we all contributed to spending $3 billion to save $350 million.
How good a deal was that?
They'll probably do a better job with healthcare, though!
I will submit that the intended consequence of ObamaCare is substantially the same.
LEFT RIOTS; RIGHT PROTESTS
The demonstrators numbered less than 1,000; there were 17-19 arrests. Contrast that to the 9/12 DC anti-tax protest: upwards of 500,000 demonstrators; no police in riot gear; no violence; no arrests.
And no garbage to be cleaned up afterward.
WHY PAY FOR THE CARELESS?
During my last shift in the ER, I had the pleasure of evaluating a patient with a shiny new gold tooth, multiple elaborate tattoos and a new cellular telephone equipped with her favorite R&B tune for a ringtone.This came to me as an email gone viral, but it is real - the author is on the emergency room staff at the Anderson Regional Medical Center in Meridian, Mississippi, and an 8th-generation Mississippian.
Glancing over the chart, one could not help noticing her payer status: Medicaid.
She smokes a costly pack of cigarettes every day and, somehow, still has money to buy beer.
And our president expects me to pay for this woman's health care?
Our nation's health care crisis is not a shortage of quality hospitals, doctors or nurses. It is a crisis of culture - culture in which it is perfectly acceptable to spend money on vices while refusing to take care of one's self or, heaven forbid, purchase health insurance.
Life is really not that hard. Most of us reap what we sow.
Starner Jones, MD
Jackson, MS
It's easy to sympathize with Dr. Jones, but the question remains: what is society's responsibility, if any, to those unwilling or unable to care for themselves?
JUST LIKE THE POST OFFICE
Since Obama himself offered the USPS as the model of the public option, we can point to this as the inevitable result of a government program in a private market. When it fails or runs over its revenue, the government will inevitably act to subsidize it. The public option will be no different at all in this regard.Surprise, surprise.
Friday, September 25, 2009
DEMOCRACY VS. LIBERTY
Found in the comments to this post.
AMERICA IS OBAMA U
Victor Davis Hansen is at his best:
It is the role of the university, from a proper distance, to help [the unwashed masses] by making sophisticated, selfless decisions on health care and the environment that the unwashed cannot grasp are really in their own interest — deluded as they are by Wal-Mart consumerism, Elmer Gantry evangelicalism, and Sarah Palin momism. The tragic burden of an academic is to help the oppressed, but blind, majority.
Read the complete article.
NAVIGATING POLITICS
It's becoming so simple to find the right path through the political mine-field -- If the Democrats are in favor, I'm against it. If the news media says it, I doubt it. If a politician says its critically important, I know it's pork.
But I didn’t, so I’ll have to give credit where credit is due.
YOU ARE ALL MORONS
Dear members of the Legislature:
It is now official: You are all morons.
The U.S. Postal Service was established in 1775. You have had 234 years to get it right. It is broke. Social Security was established in 1935. You have had 74 years to get it right. It is broke. Fannie Mae was established in 1938. You have had 71 years to get it right. It is broke. The War on Poverty started in 1964. You have had 45 years to get it right. One trillion dollars of our money is confiscated each year and transferred to "the poor"; it hasn't worked. Medicare and Medicaid were established in 1965. You have had 44 years to get them right; they're broke. Freddie Mac was established in 1970 - you have had 39 years to get it right. It is broke.
Trillions of dollars in the massive political payoff called the TARP bill of 2009 show no sign of working.
And finally to set a new record: "Cash for Clunkers" was established in 2009 and went broke in 2009! It took good dependable cars (that were the best some people could afford), replaced them with high priced, and mostly Japanese models, so a good percentage of he profits from the sales went out of the country.
So with a perfect 100% failure rate and a record proving that the "services" you shove down our throats are failing faster and faster, you want Americans to believe you can be trusted with a government-run health care system? 15% of our economy? Are you crazy?
Truly, the inmates are running the asylum!
It's a fair point. Every one of the programs mentioned started with good intentions; every one - with the possible exception of the Postal Service - failed to live up to expectations. So if one agrees with the quotation often misattributed to Ben Franklin, "The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results," it follows that the inmates are indeed running the asylum.
PRESIDENTIAL POLLS
Given Glenn’s readership, I expected significant Palin support, but I didn’t expect such miniscule support for Huckabee -- a surprise 2%.
[Added Note] Hot Air has just published a PPP (Public Policy Polling) presidential preference poll. Different polling population, obviously, and in it, Huckabee does quite well, equalling Sarah Palin in popularity.
What’s happening with Huck?
[Update] Instapundit has a new poll up. Results as of 4:40 pm on 9/25: Palin, 37%; Romney, 15%; Petraeus, 13%; Jindal, 7%; and Huckabee still hovering at under 2%.
FROM MY EMAIL
Does anybody remember the reason given for the establishment of the Department of Energy during the Carter Administration?Another example of an unintended but easily foreseeable consequence of a "good idea."
Anybody? ... No? ... Didn't think so. Bottom line .. we've spent several hundred billion dollars in support of an agency ... the reason for which no one can remember.
It was very simple and at the time everybody thought it very appropriate. The Department of Energy was instituted on August 4, 1977 to lessen our dependence on foreign oil.
And now it’s 2008, 31 years later, and the budget for this necessary department is $23 billion a year. It has 6,000 federal employees and approximately 100,000 contract employees and look at the job it has done!
This is where you slap your forehead and say “What was I thinking?” And now we are going to turn the banking system, auto industry, and health care over to them?
MR. OBAMA GOES TO TURTLE BAY
Ok, I came in, dissed Bush, offered hope and change, and deigned to sacrifice myself, the smartest you’ll ever meet, for you, the world. So now we aren’t Bush’s America, but Obama’s America, and therefore I expect you to reciprocate in kind — since you only have one last chance to get a divine American president of my caliber.Victor Davis Hanson observes: “Obama tragically does not understand that America made him — he does not make America.”
More proof that America made a mistake electing him.
ATTITUDE ADJUSTMENT
My thoughts, too. In terms of attitude, I went from Granddad to Dad during the Watergate years; and from Dad to Son following the 2008 presidential election.Granddad: "I remember thinking we could trust politicians to do what's best for us."
Dad: "I remember thinking that some politicians might not be lying sometimes."
Son: "I'm thinking that if a lobbyist paid 'em to, there isn't one who wouldn't kick a nun in public ... then write a book and blame 'the system'."
Is it possible to get more cynical?
START THE DAY WITH A SMILE
1. Open a new file in your computer.Via Don Surber. Thanks for the laugh!
2. Name it ‘Barack Obama’.
3. Send it to the Recycle Bin.
4. Empty the Recycle Bin.
5. Your PC will ask you: ‘Do you really want to get rid of ‘Barack Obama?’
6. Firmly click ‘Yes.’
7. Feel better?
GOOD!
Tomorrow we’ll do Nancy Pelosi…
FAMOUS [NEA] ARTISTS SCHOOL
Well, they’re back!
Via Instapundit.
OBAMA WORSHIP
The video was apparently made at a New Jersey elementary school. The news report is unclear exactly when it was made and when it was posted on You Tube.
What’s next -- Obama’s visage omnipresent in every public building?
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
WHAT IF?
How about slower traffic, less accidents, safer streets?I've argued something similar - that seat belt usage can encourage more aggressive driving habits.
In a never ending quest to make our streets safer and more predictable, we may have actually made them more dangerous and so mind numbingly easy to drive that we enable bad behaviors ... while driving.
Let me reiterate .. the design of our streets may be partially to blame for drivers text messaging.
It's an interesting "what if," but the evidence is anecdotal.
THE PACEMAKER TAX
"This will raise the price of pacemakers making the pacemaker less affordable and less available, while forcing people to do without, which will worsen health care."
In engineering, it's a result of the the Laws of Unintended Consequences.
ObamaCare is too complex; too hurried. It's time for Congress to stop, take a deep breath, and start over.
LOOKS LIKE A TAX TO ME
So personal responsibility is now taxable?
IGNORANCE? OR ARROGANCE?
Read it all.
IT’S NOT A TAX
From the Clinton playbook: Barack Obama and the meaning of “tax.”
ON OBAMACARE OPPONENTS
"Our country is great because people can say what they think and they believe," [Speaker of the House Nancy] Pelosi added. "But I also think that they have to take responsibility for any incitement that they may cause."... play the 'fear' and 'violence' cards.
THREE VIDEO CLIPS
Why You Should Run For OfficeWatch them all.
How the #1 Public University Produces First-Rate Idiots
Getting Rich Off Racism
Tuesday, September 22, 2009
UNCLE KNOWS BEST
When it comes to greenhouse-gas emissions, Energy Secretary Steven Chu sees Americans as unruly teenagers and the Administration as the parent that will have to teach them a few lessons.Yep. Put pre-K in charge of the high-school classroom.
“The American public…just like your teenage kids, aren’t acting in a way that they should act,” Dr. Chu said. “The American public has to really understand in their core how important this issue is.”
OBAMA'S GESTURES
We are living in a dangerous time. It seems highly unlikely that Barack Obama will get his way in domestic affairs. The Democrats may control Congress, but they now fear a rout in 2010, and they are likely to tread with caution from now on. In foreign affairs, however, presidents have a relatively free hand, and this president has ample time to do damage to a country that, there is reason to suspect, he deeply hates.Read it all, and make your own decision.
HOT LANES ARE RACIST
Are HOT (high occupancy toll) lanes stupid? Certainly. Racist? C’mon. Give me a break.
WHAT A DIFFERENCE A YEAR MAKES
2008: Peter Orzag, director of the Congressional Budget Office from January 2007 to November 2008: “deficits in Social Security would not come until 2019.”At least I’ll get (some of) mine. Tough luck for the rest of you.
2009: Peter Orszag, director of the [White House] Office of Management and Budget, member of the Obama Cabinet: “the CBO has determined that Social Security will run cash deficits next year and in 2011, and by 2016 will be more or less in permanent deficit mode.”
OBAMA LIES AGAIN
"Well, there have been plenty of omnibuses since, but few so risible as Obama’s answers this Sunday to George Stephanopoulos concerning the ACORN scandal:"
STEPHANOPOULOS: How about the funding for ACORN?ACORN is the best-known community organizing group in the country. Obama was a community organizer. He knows perfectly well where their money comes from.
OBAMA: You know, if — frankly, it’s not really something I’ve followed closely. I didn’t even know that ACORN was getting a whole lot of federal money.
And Joe Wilson was admonished by Congress for speaking the truth?
[Update & Bump] ACORN, I hardly knew ya.
A BLINDING GLIMPSE OF THE OBVIOUS
Did I mention that liberals (and that includes the media) are so adept at reading between the lines that they can't actually read the lines? Why, yes. Yes, I did.
THREAT ASSESSMENT
Today, the military is perceiving that the administration is punting the question of a troop increase in Afghanistan, and the military is even questioning the administration’s commitment to succeed in Afghanistan.It appears that Obama is trying to vote “present” again. He should pay less attention to Jimmy Carter and more attention to another Democrat former president, Harry Truman, who famously said “The buck stops here.”
KILLING GRANNY
In his Newsweek column, Evan Thomas makes the case for letting Granny go (or thinks he does) in the context of discussing his mother's decision to forgo heroic measures to keep her alive at the end of her life. Unfortunately, in his concern for keeping the cost down, Mr. Thomas danced around the essential point: it was his mother's decision; not his, not doctors, not lawyers, not insurance companies, not Medicare.
Ken Blackwell responds: "No, of course President Obama doesn’t want to unplug your grandmother.... It’s just that when he takes over health care, ... millions of decisions are going to be made. And they’ll be made by well-intentioned but fuzzy-thinking Obama [acolytes]."
They won't be made by Granny.
OFFICIAL RECOGNITION
Senator John McCain: Carter worst president in 20th century.
STILL SMUG AFTER ALL THESE YEARS
The mistake of crying racism is especially tempting to upscale, influential liberals who, no less than protesters on the right, are ducking the true causes of dispossession, fear and rage: the premises and practices of financial capital, predatory consumer marketing and a national-security state boondoggling.After all these years, liberals are still smug in their certainty that there can't possibly be principled opposition to their plans and programs.
THE DEVIL WEARS PRAVDA
Da Svidaniya, America.
Monday, September 21, 2009
DANCING WITH THE CZARS?
Does anyone have ideas for more czars? Death czar? Too grim. Media czar? Too real. Teleprompter czar? Maybe.
NONDEDUCTABLE MEDICAL EXPENSE
Perhaps he should try claiming a medical expense deduction for prosthetutes.
Via Instapundit (here and here).
TIMING IS EVERYTHING
[The] U.S. president’s cancellation last week of plans to place missile interceptors in Poland and a radar station in the Czech Republic ... came on Sept. 17, the 70th anniversary of the Soviet invasion of Poland.The Poles were not amused.
JIMMY CARTER, PLEASE SHUT UP
There's an old saying you might want to keep in mind: when you're in a deep hole, stop digging!
NEA: SUPPORT OBAMA’S AGENDA
What I don’t understand is why the Obama administration felt the need to ask.
Details here.
AN EMPTY SUIT
I think they’re overestimating his depth.
Sunday, September 20, 2009
Saturday, September 19, 2009
THE INCREDIBLE SHRINKING PRESIDENT
Read through the comments for the post title.
FLEAS, AD INFINITUM
much longer history.
The couplet is from the great British mathematician Augustus De Morgan (1806-1871), who adapted it from the Anglo-Irish satirist, essayist and author Jonathan Swift (1667-1745).
De Morgan:
Great fleas have little fleas upon their backs to bite 'em,Swift:
And little fleas have lesser fleas, and so ad infinitum.
And the great fleas themselves, in turn, have greater fleas to go on;
While these again have greater still, and greater still, and so on.
So, naturalists observe, a flea[Added Note]: The phrase “mimsy were the borogroves” is from Lewis Carroll’s Jabberwocky. It’s also the title of a science fiction book written by Lewis Padgett (aka Henry Kuttner and Catherine L. Moore), published in 1943, which I read - and enjoyed - as a teen sci-fi addict.
Has smaller fleas that on him prey;
And these have smaller still to bite ’em;
And so proceed ad infinitum
NASA WATCH
The Committee concludes that no rational exploratory program can be funded under the existing funding constraint and that plans for America's space exploration program would de facto be halted and human operations limited to low earth orbit.... The reason ... is, simplistically stated, that for sixty percent of the needed funds, one cannot go sixty percent of the way to Mars.Given the proclivities of the current Administration, this doesn’t look good.
INSURANCE EXCHANGE RISKS
Regina Herzlinger, a professor at the Harvard Business School, adds detail to my concern, using the Massachusetts government exchange, the Connector, as Exhibit A.
I’d like to believe that the health insurance exchange concept would work, provided that exchanges are entirely private, have national reach, and enjoy the same tax status as employer-sponsored plans.
P*SS ON EARTH
Over Hungary, by the Ruins of Essegvar. Last Wednesday, several skygazers scratched their heads when they saw this mysterious glow in the sky. To anyone who's ever pondered what urine looks like in space -- c'mon, don't be shy -- we say: wonder no more, because photos of the phenomenon have finally hit the internet.
Via Instapundit.
Friday, September 18, 2009
YOU DON’T SAY
Okay, so how about if I just call them bigots?
MUGGED BY REALITY
MAINSTREAM UNICORNS
Of course not. Liberals believe they are the mainstream. They also believe in unicorns.
ADVANCED PLANNING DIRECTIVES
From Brewster Rockit:
And my personal ObamaCare counseling invitation:
(with apologies to the cemetary; the mailing just happened to arrive at the right time)
OBAMACARE IS DEAD?
Maybe it’s time to start reading HR3200, the Republican alternative, which can be found here. As with the Democrat’s bill, it is only 1,000 pages long, which (to me) says it’s also problematic.
WHY ARE LIBERALS STILL ANGRY?
The most fundamental principle liberals have is that they are all very, very smart, and everyone should listen to them. Nothing angers them more than [having someone challenge] them.
Heh.
CLUELESSNESS
"Profits are not taken off the top but are what’s left at the bottom, after expenses get paid — and expenses are the 'overhead,' which includes items like salaries, supplies, rent, and so on."
"By the way, that’s why it’s called 'the bottom line,' because that’s where people find the profits in a ledger. Profits come last."
WIMP OR WARRIOR?
Yes.
GRADING THE QDR
The 2010 QDR seeks to answer the question of whether the US should posture its forces and focus its acquisitions on dealing with conventional threats from rising peer competitors or more asymmetric threats emanating from weak and failing states.The QDR is, at its best, a difficult high-wire act with no safety net, long on good intentions and short on successful actions. Given the dramatic philosophical difference between the Bush and Obama administrations and the demonstrated incompetence of the Obama administration with respect to its domestic agenda, dead on arrival looks right.
The search for answers is being structured around the concept of "hybrid warfare," ... a concept ... so loosely defined that it does not provide clear criteria for decision-making. Service efforts to define it have so far been little more that shopping lists for every possible contingency mixed with buzzwords that appear to have meaning only as long as they are not examined in any detail.
In practice, any concept that effectively justifies anything ends in justifying absolutely nothing.
THE PROBLEM WITH YOU CONSERVATIVES
This would be funny if it weren't almost word-for-word the Pacifica radio script I listened to last month.
Thursday, September 17, 2009
ACORN FALLS; PELOSI CLUELESS
Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi is clueless, which I wouldn’t have believed possible.
As Glenn Reynolds usually puts it, ”The country’s in the very best of hands.”
IT’S AUTUMN AND THE ACORNS ARE FALLING
Jon Stewart (skip to 05:00) wondered where the media was; and (finally) a major newspaper has taken a (squishy) stand, rebuking ACORN while decrying O’Keefe’s and Giles’ method as “distasteful.”
Commenter The Grey Man gets the last word: “Why are these methods “distasteful”? And why is ... [the MSM] ... being so elitist? O’Keefe and [his] partner are merely poor, undocumented journalists doing the work that regular American journalists do not want to do. I think Congress should enact legislation to give ... undocumented [journalists] amnesty, or at least a pathway to full journalism.”
TWELVE STEPS TO SANITY
“I no longer feel any political party or representative in Washington represents my views or works to pursue the issues important to me.”
One, illegal immigration. [S]top coddling illegal immigrants and secure our borders.
Two, the TARP bill. Freeze, repeal.
Three, Czars. Fire the czars.
Four, cap and trade. The debate on global warming is not over.
Five, universal healthcare. Slow down. Don't you dare try to pass this in the middle of the night.
Six, growing government control. Shrink it down. I want less government, not more.
Seven, ACORN. I want them investigated.
Eight, redistribution of wealth. No, no, no. I work for my money. It is mine.
Nine, charitable contributions. Charity belongs in our local communities. Butt out.
Ten, corporate bailouts. Knock it off. [Let them} sink or swim like the rest of us.
Eleven, transparency and accountability. How about it? [G]ive the buzzwords a rest and have some straight honest talk.
Twelve, unprecedented quick spending. Stop it now.
“Democrat, Republican, independent, libertarian. Understand this. We don't care. We are going to fire all of you who abuse power and seek more. It is not your power. It is ours and we want it back..”
Well said.
SCRAP THE EUROPEAN MISSILE SHIELD
European reaction is mixed. Russia applauds the policy change; Poland and the Czech Republic are relieved not to be targets, but have based much of their future security policy on getting the missile defenses from the United States.
The immediate reaction in the US from the left is that the change "makes strategic sense;" from the right, the reaction appears to be that “[t]his represents a complete capitulation to Russia's Vladimir Putin, who had demanded that the proposed deployments be halted as a price for improved relations.” Instapundit put it this way: ”It really is like Jimmy Carter all over again. Well, actually that’s looking like a best-case scenario these days.”
I doubt it’s as bad as the right's position makes it to be, since the Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) is in fact still a developmental system, but the “sell-out” image does leave a bad taste.
JOHN GALT, M.D.
“The poll contradicts the claims of not only the White House, but also doctors' own lobby — the powerful American Medical Association — both of which suggest the medical profession is behind the proposed overhaul.”
The article is here.
Thanks to Instapundit for the title.
OBAMA ADMINISTRATION EXPLAINED
On healthcare:
“[W]ould you want an autonomous family practitioner, entrepreneurial, keen to adopt to patient needs and tastes, juggling 10 employees and a 2-million-dollar family practice budget, grossing $400,000 a year in profits, highly opinionated and self-reliant, using his profits once in a while to ski or buy a BMW—or have him transmogrified into a GS-something, at $100,000 a year, with government benefits, unionized, docile, and waiting to go home when his shift at the dreary government clinic ends, wearing his doctor union T-shirt to work and eager to vote in politicians who ensure him lifetime tenure, generous retirement packages, and guaranteed pay raises?”
On wealth:
“[B]y April 16 of each year we will all make about the same: those who make “too much” will return their stolen goods; those who were fleeced and ‘make too little’ will receive it back through recycled entitlements, with the proper amount skimmed off at the top by the technocracy, immune from the very statutes they craft.”
On the environment:
“[T]he rambunctious ignorant American should put away his energy-stealing boat, SUV, and snowmobile, and instead live in accordance to the green dictates of an Al Gore, John Kerry, Tom Friedman and others, all once again, properly exempt from the effects of their own ‘small earth’ advocacies.”
On racism:
“I fear that this is the most polarizing administration we have seen in matters of race since the 1920s. If those around Obama, and his supporters in Congress, had just substituted the word ‘black’ each time they have angrily invoked the word ‘white’, they would have been branded abject racists.”
SIGN THE PETITION
Congressman Fleming is encouraging people to go on his website and sign his petition.
I did, and why not? It can't hurt; it may help.
THE NEXT GREATEST GENERATION
Thanks, kids. You're already picking up the tab for my retirement. It's really, really nice of you to agree to pay for my healthcare too.
Love,
Dad
MARY TRAVERS HAS DIED
My condolences.
Wednesday, September 16, 2009
HOME OF THE WHOPPER
And President Obama's lost it. Read the entire article.
JUST A THOUGHT
JIMMY CARTER OPENS MOUTH; INSERTS FOOT
James Earl Carter, Jr. is himself a racist bigot.
[Update] More Mush From The Wimp: “Jimmah’s empty slander is just another sign of the unbecoming moral vanity at the heart of the modern Left, to say nothing of its overweening intolerance for any hint of dissent.”
Via Instapundit.
HOW 'BOUT THAT?
Jeez, is she ever dumb.
A DOCTOR ON OBAMACARE
I want [my patients] to have insurance that will pay for their care, and I want to be able to offer new medications and the most sophisticated treatment. I want to be able to give preventive care as well as to monitor patients effectively if they develop diseases. I want to be able care for my patients in their homes, and I want to offer palliative care if it becomes necessary. I want them to be able to afford all this.Here’s Dr. Feldman’s “top ten” list. My comments are in italics.
I want to see major reforms in health care -- I just don't want what is on the table.
1. Private insurance companies escape real regulation.
I respect his experience, but I suspect the problem is over-regulation rather than under-regulation. I’d like to be able to buy health insurance to my own specification, even with a pre-existing condition, outside an employer plan, as an individual or as a member of a “common-interest” coalition, out-of-state, if necessary. Over-regulation, not under-regulation, prevents me.2. We urgently need tort reform, but it's nowhere to be seen.
Yes, but ... the neurosurgeon who operated on my mother was afraid of single-payer healthcare specifically because there would be no lawyers. His fear is that malpractice will increase rather than decrease under a single-payer healthcare system.3. "Prevention" won't magically make costs go down.
Too true, and much under-discussed. The fact is that “prevention” has been driving costs up, not down.4. Reform efforts don't address our critical shortage of health-care workers.
5. We need more primary-care physicians -- but we also need specialists.
Agreed, but 4 and 5 are not health insurance issues.6. We have to streamline drug development and shake up the Food and Drug Administration.
Yes, but again it isn’t an insurance issue. The FDA is far too conservative, and its “nanny-ish” tendencies badly need curtailing.7. We can't fund health-care reform by cutting payments to doctors.
We can if we cut their overhead at the same time. I’ve read that something on the order of 30% of a doctor’s income is spent to comply with pointless bureaucratic regulation.8. We can't forget about research.
OK, but again, this isn’t an insurance issue.9. Cutting reimbursements could shut some hospitals down.
Same comment as 7 above.10. We need to improve the quality of care.
Quality? or process? In either case, it isn’t an insurance issue.My bottom line is that we need to put the patient (me!) back in charge. To put it somewhat crudely, I own the car; I drive it; I’m responsible for it. Therefore I make the decisions.
ANOTHER DEFINITION OF INSANITY
Same result in either case, but by buying, at least we get something tangible in return - and without %!$$-ing off the Chinese to boot.
DC PROTEST NOT TOO SHABBY
The source is here.
[Update] The best estimate is now more than 500,000.
AMERICA’S HEALTHY FUTURE ACT OF 2009
USE FINE PRINT
Is there such a thing as extra-fine tip chalk? And if there is, will our Congresscritters be able to read it?
The stairs along the West Front of the Capitol are impressive, but the healthcare bill now stands at over 1,000 pages.
[Update] They should use the Senate bill - it's only 223 pages.
THOUGHTS ON OBAMACARE
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
HEALTHCARE
Obama: "There is “agreement in this chamber on 80% of what needs to be done.”
Eighty percent? There may an 80% agreement that certain things need to be fixed, but I think the agreement on how to fix them is substantially less.DETAILS
Obama: “Nothing in this plan will require you or your employer to change the coverage or the doctor you have.”
Unless the plan you have disappears, or the doctor leaves. That’s already true under the current system, and there’s nothing in ObamaCare that leads me to believe that it won’t get worse, with the “public option” as the plan of next resort.Obama: “[It will be against the law for insurance companies to deny you coverage because of a preexisting condition ... or ... drop your coverage when you get sick or water it down when you need it most.”
Obama: “[Insurance companies] will no longer be able to place some arbitrary cap on the amount of coverage you can receive ....”
Obama: “We will place a limit on how much you can be charged for out-of-pocket expenses ....”
And every one of these “against-the-laws” will cost additional money. How can they not increase the basic cost?Obama: “[Insurance companies] will be required to cover ... routine checkups and preventive care ....”
Obama: "We’ll creat[e] a new insurance exchange - a marketplace where individuals and small companies will be able to shop for health insurance at competitive prices.”First, it’s already been shown that preventive care does not save money in either the short or long term.
Second, if it covers routine/preventive care, it’s not insurance; it’s prepaid medical care. I have no problem if some folks want to buy prepaid medical care, but what of those of us who want insurance for catastrophic events (like hospitalization)?
This is actually a good idea, and one I could agree with if Obama would limit the government role to writing the law allowing private cooperatives to be formed.Obama: “[F]or those ... who still can’t afford ... [insurance] ... we’ll provide tax credits ....”
For example, I’m a member of the Northern Virginia Electric Cooperative, which supplies electricity to my house. I own it (well, along with thousands of others) and consequently have immediate motive to ensure that it’s well run.
I’m also a member of a number of professional organizations and credit unions who could serve as the “sponsor” of an insurance exchange. In each case, I have reason, responsibility, and means to ensure it would be run to my satisfaction.
Which will have to be paid for by taxes somewhere else. Who? I'll bet that since I'm the one who can (barely) afford insurance, I'll get the "privilege" of paying more for the same service. Give me a reason why I should.Obama: "[I]ndividuals will be required to carry basic health insurance.”
The auto insurance analogy Obama used is clever, but wrong. States require auto liability insurance - for damage to others. Personal property, collision, and comprehensive are not required (except by the lienholder).LIES AND MISREPRESENTATIONS
More importantly, how does the administration propose to verify -and enforce - the requirement that every individual has insurance? Never mind the probable invasion of personal privacy; think about this: How many uninsured vehicles are on the road, despite the fact that all cars must be registered with the state to travel on public highways?
In choosing to discuss the "lies and misrepresentations" promoted about Obamacare, the President asserted that with his health care reform, there will be:
“No death panels.”
“No insuring illegal immigrants.”Of course not. The “death panel” is a metaphor - vivid, it's true - for the certain knowledge that Obama’s health care reform will be resource limited and inevitably rationed.
Our current system already rations health care - by price. So knowing that rationing already exists, the "death panel" question is simply one of "Who gets rationed?"
And knowing what we already know about the government’s efficiency at delivering services, is there any reason to believe that the rationing won’t get worse?
Technically, the statement is true, I suppose, but without an enforcement mechanism - which isn't in the bill before Congress - it’s meaningless.“No federal dollars for abortions”
So does that mean that the “public option” will cover less than private plans? I suspect that there's a discrimination question yet to be addressed in the "no federal dollars" assertion.“No ‘government takeover -’ public plan is an option only for those who don’t have [private] insurance.”
Obama [intentionally?] misses the point. The fear is that the “public option” cost will be low enough to encourage employers to quit offering insurance (and insurance companies to quit offering individual plans) and thereby force Americans into a public option plan backed by the federal government (where the risk is lower).“No taxpayer subsidy for the ‘public insurance’ option.”
Here’s the question: if there’s no taxpayer subsidy, isn’t it almost by definition just another private insurance option? For the answer, look to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Both are obstensibly private corporations, backed by "full faith and credit" of the federal government. Now ask yourself “What was the proximate cause of the housing bust?” Answer: government meddling.PAYING FOR OBAMACARE
Obama: “I will not sign [a plan] if it adds one dime to the deficit, now or in the future, period.”
If true, then Obama can’t sign the bill he outlined in his speech, as it’s already been scored as not deficit-neutral by the Congressional Budget Office.Obama: “[M]ost of this plan can be paid for by finding savings within the existing health care system, a system that is currently full of waste and abuse.”
Unfortunately, we’re all too aware that the federal government is bloated, inefficient, wasteful, and pork-laden; so there’s little doubt that savings are potentially there. How much? And can Obama produce them? Produce the savings first; then fund the reform.Obama: “[M]uch of the rest would be paid for with revenues from the very same drug and insurance companies that stand to benefit from tens of millions of new customers. And this reform will charge insurance companies a fee for their most expensive policies, which will encourage them to provide greater value for the money .”
Okaaaaay. I see two realistic possibilities. One, prices for the ‘gold-plated’ policies go up, or two, the gold-plating turns bronze. The latter seems more likely (and is probably the administration’s preferred option).To summarize my thoughts, essentially there was nothing new in President Obama's address. Despite his assertion to the contrary ("My door is always open ..."), there was no hint of bipartisanship in his address. His use of phrases such as “scare tactics,” “score short-term political points”, and “think it is better politics to kill this plan” were aimed directly at Republicans and intended to exclude them.
The President doesn’t, can't, or won’t understand that there can be principled opposition to his plan. John Hinderaker had this to say: “I’m not sure whether Obama and his handlers understand how this sort of talk grates on those of us who are not liberal Democrats (a large majority of the country). Debating public policy issues is not ‘bickering.’ Disagreeing with a proposal to radically change one of the largest sectors of our economy is not a ‘game.’ This kind of gratuitous insult – something we never heard from President Bush, for example – is one of the reasons why many consider Obama to be mean-spirited.”
The President’s “cost analysis” simply doesn’t hold water. The CBO has already scored the health care reform as budget-busting, and no amount of smooth-talking is going to change that. As I noted above, if there is so much waste and inefficiency in Medicare/Medicaid, why not wring it out and only then use the savings to fund reform? Arnold Kling had the same thought but was more sarcastic: “Reducing the waste and inefficiency in Medicare and Medicaid will pay for most of this plan ... And if we don’t pass this plan, does he intend to keep the waste and inefficiency, out of spite?”
The answer is “of course he will” simply because no administration or Congress has ever been able to reduce it.
And that’s why Obama's "payment plan" doesn't hold water.
FOR THEE, BUT NOT FOR ME
Or, in other words: “'The higher taxes, debt payments and interest rates needed to pay for health reform mean lower living standards.' But lower living standards for you are a small price to pay in exchange for more power for the political class — whose living standards won’t be going down at all . . . . "
CABLE NEWS HEADLINES
FOX Headlines
- Mullen: More Troops = Victory
- Senate Cuts ACORN Loose
- Closing In on Ivy League Campus Killer?
* 'Cash for Clunkers' Spawns Retail Sales Hike
- Airline Workers Busted on Drug Smuggling Charges
- Israel, Palestinians Guilty of 'War Crimes'?
- North Korea Unwilling to Give Up Nukes, South Says
- Recount Ordered at 10 Percent of Afghan Polls
* Iraqi Shoe Thrower Freed, Claims He Was Tortured
- H1N1 Spreads Long After Fever
- Obama Renews Push for Wall Street Oversight
* House to Discipline Wilson for 'You Lie!' Outburst
- FBI: Watch Out for Bomb Materials in NYC
- Schools on Pledge: You Have Right to Remain Silent
- Teens Sue Team Over 'God Bless America' Ejection
- Tracking Taxes: Unnecessary Earmark Projects Linger
? Baucus Health Bill May Leave Dems Cold
- Iran Nuclear Talks Likely to Be Held in Turkey
- McCain and Graham Hold Town Hall
CNN Headlines
- Student fatally stabbed at Florida school
- Actor Patrick Swayze dies after cancer fight
- Al Qaeda operative reported dead in U.S. strike
* Clunkers drives up retail sales
- 16 hurt after train hits barricade
- Ted's sons: Father 'very good at overcoming ...'
- Is Obama witch doctor image racist?
* Bush shoe thrower says he was tortured
? Don't cut my (public) health care
* Rep. Wilson faces resolution of disapproval
- Dem's 'urine' comments raise eyebrows
- Insurgents blown up by their own IED
- Girl, 8, hides, calls 911 during robbery
- Kanye tells Leno outburst 'was rude, period'
- Kanye gets called every name in the book
- Whitney Houston spills drug secrets
- Del Potro U.S. Open win is 'dream come true'
- 9 photos hooked on a feeling
- Police dog poisoned with anti-freeze
- Woman, 107, fears hubby No. 22 will leave her
- Senators split on approach to Afghanistan
Of 40 stories, only 4 (!) were common to both, and one (marked with question mark instead of the asterisk) I gave the benefit of doubt, since both the FOX and CNN stories were generally about healthcare.
Do FOX and CNN report on the same America?
HARDENING OF THE ATTITUDES
The approval chart (updated today), though, shows a distinct hardening of the attitudes. Strong approvals (green) are clearly leveling, at about 30%. Strong disapprovals (red) are still rising, however, and show little tendency to flatten. The worrisome trend for Obama is that the undecideds (black) are continuing to jump ship and move strongly toward disapproval.
The trend lines are almost unchanged from a post earlier this month.
JACKASS
Imagine that.
Now imagine “President George W. Bush, a white man, calls Kayne West, a black man, a jackass. ABC reports: ‘Now THAT’S presidential.’ ”
I can’t either.
BEWARE THE LIBERAL ARISTOCRACY
“In our two-party democracy, it never is. And shouldn't be.”
DID YOU FAIL YOUR COMMON SENSE TEST?
DECONSTRUCTING THE MINISTRY OF TRUTH
I don’t think the public is “changing the channel” this time. I think they’ve decided to turn the set off.
Monday, September 14, 2009
WORKS AND DAYS
CZARS I CAN LIVE WITH
Via Instapundit.
The "Boob Czar" reminds me of Dolly Parton's reply when asked if she would run for public office: "We've got too many boobs in office already."
LISTENING TO A LIAR
There are lots of people in the Obama administration who want to do things that have not been done before-- and to do them before the public realizes what is happening.
It’s all about control. Read the entire column.
THE TRAGEDY OF THE COMMONS
Are they the world's best-trained physicians and health care professionals who care for our loved ones? Perhaps our hospitals, which bring both employment and cutting-edge medical technologies to our communities? Our pharmaceutical, biotechnology and device companies, whose researchers give hope to those afflicted with diseases once thought incurable? Or our insurance companies, which provide access to these vital health services and whose nurses help coordinate care for patients? The answer is all of these groups standing together. The villain is our collective overgrazing on the commons of the U.S. health care system.
He forgot the most important villan - us.
DEFENDING VAN JONES
No, you fire him for being an idiot.
Sunday, September 13, 2009
MEDICARE FOR ALL?
There's just one minor problem. Medicare is in the hole and digging faster than ever. The projected deficit in 2007 was $74.6 trillion; in 2008, the projected deficit grew to $85.9 trillion.