MORE: "the most open and transparent [administration] in history."
Thursday, March 31, 2011
The president's proposal relies primarily on increased domestic production, conservation and a shift to biofuels and natural gas.Hmm. Domestic production. Is there somewhere in the United States that hasn’t been put off limits? Conservation. Voluntary ... or mandatory by way of taxation? Biofuels? Not unless starvation is an option.
The president also announced that he is directing the federal government to ensure that all its vehicle purchases are alternative fuel, hybrid or electric cars by 2015.And the higher taxes that go with them.
Higher fuel efficiency standards for cars will be announced this fall ... [and] a new fuel efficiency standard will be proposed for heavy-duty trucks, he added.Better plan on driving that clunker into the ground - if you didn't fall for "cash for clunkers."
"The United States of America cannot afford to bet our long-term prosperity and security on a resource that will eventually run out."Any resource will run out if you don’t produce more.
"[D]rill baby drill" -- a reference to the push for more domestic oil drilling -- would do little to provide short-term price relief.But if we’d started 20, even 10 years ago?
Obama ripped GOP budget proposals that would strip money away from his renewable energy agenda.I’ll believe in renewable energy when it can be shown to be both reliable and cost-effective. Until then ....
I’m no great fan of marijuana, but I can live with them if they in turn will live with my cigarettes.
McCaskill needs to go.
Here on the first anniversary of the signing of the federal healthcare bill and Virginia's lawsuit, I wanted to update you on developments in Virginia's healthcare case and let you know what to look for in the next couple of weeks.My conclusion? At best, there's a long way to go. This one, I believe, will be solved politically, not legally.Virginia is on a 'dual track' in the case at the moment. We have a motion to expedite the case pending in the U.S. Supreme Court and at the same time we are briefing the case for presentation to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals - the appellate court that covers Virginia.
Supreme Court
We have asked the Supreme Court to expedite the case under its Rule 11. They only do this for one or two cases per decade, so don't bet a lot of money on this one; however, the nature and cost of the healthcare law is the type that they have expedited in the past, so we'll see what they do.
We submitted the final brief on expediting this week. The Supreme Court will consider our request on April 15th. We could see a decision by the Supreme Court as soon as April 18th.
What does "expediting" mean under Supreme Court Rule 11? Basically it means to skip the appellate court and go straight to the Supreme Court.
There are three levels of federal courts: district courts, appellate courts (aka circuit courts), and the Supreme Court. We won in the district court in December. The federal government appealed to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals (the 4th Circuit covers Maryland, Virginia, West Virginia, and the Carolinas). In the ordinary course of things, the Supreme Court would follow the Court of Appeals.
Under Rule 11 of the Supreme Court, Virginia has requested that the Supreme Court pull the case out of the Court of Appeals and hear it directly. This could cut almost a year off of the case, resulting in ENORMOUS savings to both state governments and the private sector if the law is found unconstitutional and stricken. And why go through all the hoops of getting ready to implement a law that may be stricken anyway? Oh, I'm sorry, there I go thinking logically again... naturally the Obama administration is opposing this effort... I know you're shocked.
You might ask yourself, 'won't the Supreme Court want to hear from Appellate Court judges?' And the answer is 'maybe.' Remember this case is pure legal argument. There are no documents or other discovery to consider, no trial witnesses, in fact there was no trial at all. So, we are re-arguing the same pure legal arguments from the district court again in the Court of Appeals. Also, five different judges have addressed the merits of the case, with more to come. So, there are going to be an unusual number of judges' opinions to look at - should the Supremes so choose - without even getting to the appeals courts.
Thus far, we are the only state requesting that the Supreme Court exercise its discretion to expedite the case. Whether or not the Supreme Court decides to expedite the case is entirely within their discretion, so it's hard to tell what may happen. When we know, I'll let you know!
4th Circuit Court of Appeals
At the same time, we are about to submit our first of two briefs in the appellate court. In their opening brief, the feds made essentially the same arguments that they made in the district court. And while we adjust our presentation to include elements of other cases, our arguments will be the same as in the district court.
We will argue our case on May 10th before a three judge panel of the 4th Circuit (assuming the Supreme Court does NOT expedite the case, thereby taking it out of the appeals court). We will not know who those three judges are until the day of the argument.
Following our hearing, it would then be reasonable to look for a ruling around mid-July. I expect each side to react differently depending on who wins.
If Virginia wins in the 4th Circuit, I expect the federal government to ask the full 4th Circuit to rehear the case en banc (i.e., with all 14 judges of the 4th Circuit participating). This would be consistent with their efforts to drag the case out, as that may add several more months in the 4th Circuit, at which point, whichever side loses en banc will appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
If the feds win in the 4th Circuit, I expect that we will immediately appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court.
Once we get to the Supreme Court, I would expect to brief and argue the case during the next term of the Court. The next term of the Court will run from the beginning of October 2011 through the end of June 2012.
I would then expect that a final decision in our case will most likely be made (best guess) toward the end of June 2012. I think it will be very hard for the Obama administration to drag the case beyond June of 2012.
Obviously, that is very interesting timing in light of the Presidential race. And it further baffles me as to why the President would want to drag the case as close to Election Day as possible.
The only rationale I can think of is the following scenario: given that this case is being carried forward primarily (though by no means exclusively) by Republicans, if we succeed in winning the case, having the individual mandate declared unconstitutional, and having the entire law stricken (as happened in the Florida case), then I believe House Republicans will need to have their alternative healthcare reforms already prepared and ready to submit. If the Republicans in the House are not so prepared, then rather than voters reacting against the President due to the loss, they will be angry at Republicans for the appearance of just saying no without having positive alternatives.
That's the only reasonable explanation for the consistent efforts to delay the case being undertaken by the Obama administration.
Again, if something happens in the 4th Circuit, I'll get back to you again to update you on the case!
'Green' options aren't getting much support.
MORE: the Earth really is a landfill.
Wednesday, March 30, 2011
Mr. Reid, your record on spending in the Senate is one of failure. You have failed to pass a budget, failed to restrain spending, and failed to put our country on sound fiscal footing. We do not accept your failure as our own. The American people did not send us here to fail. Make no mistake: any government shutdown is the result of your lack of leadership.Mr. McConnell, Mr. Boehner, if you like your jobs and want to keep them, listen up! America is speaking to you, too.
Eliminating or reducing ethanol subsidies and trade barriers will help decrease the federal budget deficit, benefit the environment, and lessen our reliance on imported oil. Historically our government has helped a product compete in one of three ways: subsidize it, protect it from competition, or require its use (emphasis mine). Ethanol may be the only product receiving all three forms of support from the U.S. government at this time.Of course, he's not running for reelection, so he can afford to be honest.
After decades of mainlining public funds, NPR's brass is understandably alarmed at the prospect of going without its drug. But addictions are unhealthy, and it is a blessing to get free of them. Ron Schiller was right: NPR would be better off if it gave up federal funding. A little tough love from Congress can finally make that happen.It's time.
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Monday, March 28, 2011
(1) It's still about "I" - not "we," "us," or the United States.And
2) He hasn't given up strawmen (the 'false choice' paragraphs).
(3) He was very uncomfortable with patriotism. Even with the teleprompter, he stumbled nearly every time he spoke about anything that could even loosely be described in terms of American exceptionalism.November 2012 can't come too soon.
Sunday, March 27, 2011
Linked from Instapundit.
Friday, March 25, 2011
With a little more courage, there won't be another short-term continuing resolution and we'll be able to get on with the real budget battle.
Thursday, March 24, 2011
An honest politician is one who stays bought.
Link from Instapundit.
Congresscritters should be required to fly commercial (steerage class, with the rest of us) and leave their security entourages behind when they enter the loving arms of TSA.
Read the rest.
Tuesday, March 22, 2011
Another reason for less government.
They're just following the money to ensure it doesn't get lost before entering their pockets.
Another profile in courage....
Monday, March 21, 2011
Reader Brad Westbrook in the March 21 edition of the Austin American-Statesman, which can't seem to get its act together well enough to have the letters online the day the print edition appears on the news stands.
Here's what I keep hoping to hear from a U.S. offical about nuclear power plants here: "We are completely terrified by the events unfolding in Japan. The worst case scenario, becoming more and more likely, is the catastrophe that sends everyone in the nuclear energy industry to their knees in fear and dread..."Well, the reason you're not hearing it is that it's simply not true. The events in Japan are a disaster, certainly, but not a nuclear disaster.
Continuing with Westbrook's letter:
"We have convened emergency meetings of all those with administrative control over nuclear power plants, along with boots-on-the-ground workers, to determine what we can do to prevent such a scenario here. Nothing is fool-proof. But we intend to implement immediately any lessons learned that we posssibly can."Umm, usually lessons-learned follow a post-mortem, which is usually well after the event. What Westbrook is suggesting is more in line with implementing lessons unlearned.
Instead, we get platitudes about how things aren't so bad, that the radioactive vapor can't possibly get to the U.S., that our nuclear reactors are perfectly safe.Again, not true. There haven been multitudinous news reports, citing government officials, that (a) it's bad; (b) radioactive emissions did occur and were in fact measured (though with very sensitive instruments) in the continental United States, and (c) whether Westbrook likes it or not, our nuclear reactors are quite safe.
Insert expletive-laced snort of disbelief here.I would advise against snorting in the future; Mr. Westbrook can ill-afford to lose any more brain tissue.
In the ongoing hue and cry over school funding in Texas, one thing is noticeably absent: the voice of the tea partyers.Letter from reader Brad Smith in the March 21 edition of the Austin (TX) American-Statesman (who, bless its incompetent little heart, can't put anything online until at least one day after the print publication hits the street).
Where are all of the letters accurately portraying our public schools as socialist? Where are the justifiable demands for property owners without children to be relieved of their school tax obligations? Where is the heartfelt insistence that families pay more for each child they have in the school system?
Let the voice of these patriots be heard.
Well. I presume Mr. Smith is single, or childless, so let me ask him if he is willing to forego his Social Security, since it will be paid for by my children. Just in case Mr. Smith is unaware (which certainly he is) his - and some of my - FICA taxes are going to pay for his parents, of which I presume he has two.
And since he is obviously willing (being childless) to forego his Social Security benefits, does he think it is appropriate for me to receive a larger Social Security benefit since I have two children?
And yes, I am both receiving a Social Security benefit check and a tea party "patriot." And additionally for those of you about to go "Aha!" I am also willing to sacrifice some of my benefits for the common good.
UPDATE: to get the "uber-partisan" reference, you'll have to link through Instapundit to the Andrew Sullivan post. I generally avoid linking Sullivan because immediately afterward I have a strong urge to wash my brain.
Sunday, March 20, 2011
Wednesday, March 16, 2011
Saturday, March 12, 2011
Linked from Instapundit.
Friday, March 11, 2011
We would be better off if we would have a hearing speaking about the importance of human intelligence. Funding for the elements of the Department of Homeland Security that can work on human resources to be able to hear from individuals who do want to engage and help this country promote its values.Incoherent: the new English.
Texting while driving - bad; texting while flying - good?
Read more here.
“I love the tea parties. It’s like a political movement of Huxtables.”
“When the Tea Partiers lost in their attempt to kill Obamacare, they went to the ballot box and voted. That’s what representative democracy looks like. Not at all like the theatrics we are seeing in Wisconsin.”
Capt. Ed Ellis (USN, retd.), head of aircraft restorations for the National Museum of Naval Aviation, in Pensacola, told EAA the Devastator is "the 'holy grail' in terms of naval aviation, and something we'd like to have in this museum."
Perhaps it's because Americans don't want to be 'regulated'.
The list of mandates is astonishing - and incomplete; no mention of preventive care, annual physicals, well-baby care, etc. No wonder "healthcare" is so expensive.
More here.
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Or reduce the number of flights ....
Follow the link. I'm convinced by the data, but I suspect there's a nugget of truth to Krugman's basic claim. The "educrats" have so cheapened a college degree that it has about the same worth as my 1962 high school diploma.
For a contrary view, see here.
You want war? Bring it, Lardbutt. You are the biggest talking, good for nothing little piece of Communist filth this country has produced in decades. You suck up to backward brutes and thugs like Castro while you castigate the American engines of the world’s economy. You trash this country and our people and belittle our values every chance you get, you cynical black hole of a human being. The worst words I can think of are too good to use to describe you. You are a buffoon, a hypocrite, and really of no use to civilization whatsoever.Brian Preston is not thrilled with Michael Moore.
Wednesday, March 09, 2011
More here. And go here for updates.
We are ... living with what results when personal charisma magnified by media adulation trumps executive management experience, demonstrated knowledge, proven judgment, the proven ability to coordinate and lead in crisis, practical private sector business experience, and the ability to forge a workable compromise.Read the whole article.
My suspicion is that NextGen will enable a return to the old 1970's model for point-to-point air transportation.
More at Instapundit.
* Yes, that's a reference to the Lee Correy book.
She might be old, but she’s still got it where it counts. The 33-year old Voyager 1 probe, flying out near the edge of the solar system conducted a roll program, spinning 70 degrees counterclockwise, and held the position by spinning gyroscopes for two hours, 33 minutes. Voyager performed its in-flight gymnastics on March 7, 2011 and scientists hope the maneuver will help answer the question of which direction is the sun’s stream of charged particles turns when it nears the edge of the solar system.Voyager's communication system was my first real job as a communications engineer in the mid-1970s.
Williams may still be a liberal, but he's one I can respect.
While the vignette is only indirectly relevant to the Wisconsin public union controversy, it does illustrate the union mind-set: if it's not covered by a union rule, it won't get done.
Linked from a Washington Examiner post.
Tuesday, March 08, 2011
Wonkette's "moral universe" reminds me of this quote from Deteriorata: "Be assured that a walk through the ocean of most souls would scarcely get your feet wet."
Linked from Instapundit.
These are difficult decisions, to be sure, but difficult decisions are best made by those closest to them - not some disinterested bureaucrat hundreds or thousands of miles away.
Linked from Instapundit, who points out the reality.
The answer is clearly “no” and I would further suggest that the reason they keep pushing mass transit is to reserve the roads for themselves.
An Instapundit reader comments: "This is just too funny. My irony meter has red-lined and wisps of smoke are curling up from it."
More here.
UPDATE from the comments here: "The Schiller character is just dripping with intellect...."
Much more - ECO:nomics.
Crony capitalism at its
But not that long ago. Time-and-motion studies were still in use when I started college back in the early ‘60s.
He forgot unicorns.
Linked from Hot Air.
It wasn’t just leftism.
Monday, March 07, 2011
Something the company I work for has yet to learn.
[W]e are emphatically commanded by Scripture to help the poor, to comfort the afflicted, and to love the stranger. But those obligations are personal, not political. It requires a considerable leap of both faith and logic to read the Bible as mandating elaborate government assistance programs, to be funded by a vast apparatus of compulsory taxation.Yes.
Put some popcorn in the microwave ....
The senior team met to discuss ... actions should the government temporarily shut down as a result of Congress’ inability to reach agreement on the budget. Unless Republicans and Democrats can come together ... the government will likely shut down.Of course, there’s no cost associated with all of this ....
[T]here may be some government offices that will be shuttered, thereby leaving some of you who work at a government site needing a place to work. There is an outside possibility that the shutdown may also affect your specific tasks for your sponsors. Your managers will be working with you on a case-by-case basis to see what your needs are and help you find space to work as needed.
The full article is here.
Read the entire post and comments.
Gee, and all this time, I thought they were compassionate altruists, toiling endlessly for the benefit of all mankind.
[President] Obama scolds [Wisconsin Gov.] Walker for trying to restrict collective bargaining by government employees to wages, yet the two million federal civilian (non-postal) workers Obama presides over can't even bargain over that much: With rare exceptions, the wages, hours, and benefits of federal employment have never been subject to union contracts. The president appears to be quite OK with that. Last November he unilaterally announced a two-year pay freeze for all federal civilian federal employees, informing them -- no negotiating -- that they were going to "make some sacrifices" adding up to $2 billion this fiscal year.Another case of “do as I say, not as I do.”
Sunday, March 06, 2011
I tend to agree with most of the commenters that this is an advocacy piece, not a news report. Read it and make up your own mind.
I don't think this is a victory for the Navy. I hope the Army and Air Force have more sense.
To recap: white students in Texas perform better than white students in Wisconsin, black students in Texas perform better than black students in Wisconsin, Hispanic students in Texas perform better than Hispanic students in Wisconsin. In 18 separate ethnicity-controlled comparisons, the only one where Wisconsin students performed better than their peers in Texas was 4th grade science for Hispanic students (statistically insignificant), and this was reversed by 8th grade. Further, Texas students exceeded the national average for their ethnic cohort in all 18 comparisons; Wisconsinites were below the national average in 8, above average in 8.More funding does not necessarily equate to better performance, but don’t expect a liberal to understand.
Translated into plain English: “You, common man, cannot be trusted to deal with Nature on your own. Instead you must demand that Government force you to accept the dictates of we “experts” who can be trusted to deal appropriately with the looming catastrophe that only we can see.” Got it?
Linked from The Corner.
Read the comments. Greenspan is catching a lot more criticism than I would have thought.
Jim Moran is a Virginia congress(hypo)critter - not my district, unfortunately. It’s time for him to go.
We already know that Sheila Jackson Lee thinks her constituents are dumb (many of them voted for Sheila Jackson Lee, so that’s tough to argue against), but she also ... accuses her staffers of being sub-stupid.Read it all; then follow this link.
Frankly I prefer the Reagan doctrine - preemptive victory.
And the Obamas are too damn cheap to buy
I repeat myself, but “it’s all about control.”
Today, at 1 pm. Will any union protestors show up?
Before too long you’ll be able to walk across the Pacific all the way from Al Gore’s seaside California mansion to Japan without getting wet by only stepping on global warming satellite and rocket wreckage.Do you think maybe Nature is trying to tell the environmental movement something?
Saturday, March 05, 2011
Arlington resident John Doyle responds (third letter):
That August thunderstorm that so frightened Mike Tidwell that he ordered his wife to "Go to the basement now!" impressed me, too. When I saw that monster barreling in, I ran to the top of the basement stairs and shouted down to my daughters to "Get up here now! You're not going to believe this storm!" The three of us stood on the porch, completely drenched, watching an absolutely glorious display of nature's power.I’m with John Doyle.
The Earth's climate is changing, just as it has for 4 billion years. The question is: How are you going to greet that change - holed up in your basement, windows barred, clutching your shotgun, or out in the front yard with your kids, stomping in enormous puddles?
Friday, March 04, 2011
Or can our next President just declare ObamaCare to be unconstitutional and just refuse to defend/enforce it?
Instapundit comments: "You take an oath to enforce the Constitution. This may give the President the authority to enforce the Constitution as he sees it, but it surely doesn’t give the President the authority to choose not to enforce the Constitution as he sees it."
That's what "collective bargaining" is about: It enables unions rather than citizens to set the price of government. It is, thus, a direct assault on republican democracy, and it needs to be destroyed. Unlovely as they are, the Greek rioters and the snarling thugs of Madison are the logical end point of the advanced social democratic state: not an oppressed underclass, but a spoiled overclass, rioting in defense of its privileges and insisting on more subsidy, more benefits, more featherbedding, more government.Correct.
MORE: I saw Rumsfeld on O'Reilly last night. He had O'Reilly on the defensive as well. Here are three exerpts from the interview.
You are too dumb to make the proper decisions, so the medical community wants to make indoor tanning illegal for your minor children.
The American Medical Association doesn’t want you to know about your own DNA, since you're not competent to understand what it means.
Bull.
The 2012 election season is heating up. There are many potential Presidential candidates, and we will make the bold prediction that every single Republican will attempt to gain the support of the tea party movement. But which candidates do this powerful grassroots movement really support?Take the straw poll.
This poll gauges such support using a unique “run-off” matchup model. It is designed to elicit deeper preferences from voters and make it much more difficult for well-organized campaigns to “game” the system. The results reflects the percentage of times a candidate was preferred in a head-to-head “run-off” against other potential candidates. We also suspect they more accurately reflect the true pulse of the tea party movement than those cited by the mainstream media.
Linked from Instapundit.
Thursday, March 03, 2011
[P]ollster Scott Rasmussen reports that 58 percent of likely voters would rather have a government shutdown until both parties can agree on spending cuts, while only 33 percent would prefer spending at the same levels as last year.The train wreck will be if the Republicans falter and choose not to take an ax to the budget.
And who supplies the Democrats’ campaign coffers? Unions, perhaps?
Wednesday, March 02, 2011
This should disabuse you of the myth that unions are “paltry players” when compared to the business lobbies. Oh, and by the way, even the non-union “big players” contribute predominately to Democrats.
Continue reading here.